The Missing 'S' Of Security

Someone's job security strategy is absolutely chef's kiss . Instead of writing clean, maintainable code, they've created a function that always returns 2, labeled it as "job security," and then made two helper functions that literally copy memory addresses to change the return value. Nothing says "I'll never be fired" like writing code that only you understand and using memcpy() to overwrite function implementations instead of, you know, just changing the original function. Because why write one line of code when you can write twenty that require a hazmat suit to maintain? Bonus points for the "NEVER call this function" comments that scream "I'm the only one who knows which landmines not to step on." Pure evil genius at work here.

Ah, the eternal UUID debate! On the left, we have the paranoid dev who's spent 72 hours straight reading cryptography papers and now can't sleep because "UUIDs might collide." Meanwhile, Chad on the right just generates two UUIDs and ships to production because he knows the odds of collision are astronomically low—like finding a bug-free JavaScript framework or someone who actually reads documentation. The virgin worrier vs. the chad pragmatist is the perfect representation of our industry's endless theoretical debates that waste time while Chad's already on his third product launch.

Behold, the modern developer in their natural habitat! This isn't just coding—it's vibe coding . Who needs security best practices when you can just commit API keys directly to GitHub? It's like hiding your house key under the doormat, except the doormat is indexed by Google. Documentation? Tests? Please. Those are for developers who don't name their variables with the perfect aesthetic. Why write tests when you can spend three hours curating the perfect lo-fi playlist that you'll listen to while not writing tests? The true art form isn't solving problems—it's creating new PRs to fix your previous PRs while your IDE looks absolutely fabulous with that custom theme you spent a day configuring. And when everything is literally on fire? That's the perfect time to update your GitHub profile README. Priorities, people!

The kid's "brute-force attack protection" is pure evil genius. While everyone's freaking out over his code, he's just sitting there with that smug little grin. His masterpiece? A login system that shows "Wrong login or password" even when the password is correct—but ONLY on the first attempt. It's basically digital psychological warfare. Every developer in that room just died inside imagining the hours of debugging hell this would cause. The coffee guy spitting out his drink is all of us realizing we'd probably format our entire machine before finding this little gem.

THE ULTIMATE REVENGE PLOT! Behold the glorious moment of sweet, sweet vengeance as our unpaid intern commits the cardinal sin of tech - exposing the company's API key to the ENTIRE INTERNET! 💅 That's right, honey! After months of free labor and "experience," they're leaving a parting gift that'll have the senior devs SCREAMING at 2AM when the AWS bill hits astronomical levels. The digital equivalent of burning the building down on your way out. Petty? Perhaps. Justified? ABSOLUTELY. Now some random hacker can enjoy all those premium services the company was too cheap to pay their interns for!

Look at this absolute masterpiece of error handling. When things go wrong, just ask OpenAI to fix it and eval() whatever it returns. Because nothing says "I trust the process" like blindly executing code from an AI in production. The cherry on top? Generating random passwords for users who probably wanted to use their own. Security through confusion - it's the new standard.