Storing Passwords The Easy Way

That awkward moment when your kid's teacher can't pronounce "$2Y$10$UgTh9EyUvedMTndo0PvF4.YkZaHx6OsMirqjR6ApgAsnPrRikwBgs" during roll call. On the plus side, absolutely no one is stealing this kid's identity. The ultimate security-minded parent move: not using your kid's name as your password, but using your incomprehensible bcrypt hash as your kid's name. Modern problems require modern solutions.

The eternal struggle between programming language evangelists continues! The meme perfectly captures the cult-like fervor of Rust developers who can't stop preaching about memory safety. Rust zealots will literally ambush you in a school bus to explain how their language prevents segmentation faults and memory leaks while C++ developers are just asking "Are y'all with the cult?" The punchline "This is it" at the end is the perfect reaction of seasoned developers who've seen language wars come and go but are now resigned to their fate of being cornered by yet another enthusiastic Rustacean.

Just trying to set up a new Windows machine when suddenly OneDrive appears with a knife, demanding your files like some cloud storage mafia enforcer. "Nice documents you got there. Would be a shame if they were... automatically synced." The eternal struggle between wanting local control and Microsoft's relentless cloud integration. Some of us just want to store files on our actual computers without paying cloud protection money.

Ah yes, the utopian fantasy where we don't need to spend 80% of our development time patching security vulnerabilities and implementing authentication systems. Without hackers, we'd all be building flying cars and teleportation devices instead of arguing about whether to hash passwords with bcrypt or Argon2id. The most dangerous thing in this pristine cityscape would be a null pointer exception, and even that would probably just result in a polite error message rather than a system meltdown. Meanwhile, back in reality, I'm implementing my 17th CAPTCHA today because someone keeps trying to brute force our login page from an IP in North Korea.

Someone just asked the forbidden question that makes every backend developer's eye twitch. The response? Pure gold. "Why do we eat and go to the bathroom when we can throw food directly in the toilet? Because stuff needs to get processed." Connecting your frontend directly to the database is like giving every stranger on the internet your house keys and hoping they'll only use the bathroom. Sure, it's technically possible, but you're basically rolling out the red carpet for SQL injection attacks, exposing your credentials in client-side code, and letting users bypass any business logic you might have. The backend is where validation happens, authentication lives, business rules get enforced, and your data stays safe from curious DevTools users. But sure, skip it if you want your app to become a cautionary tale on r/netsec.

Remember when "hacking" meant typing "eh" into Hotmail instead of spending 12 years learning advanced cryptography and neural network vulnerabilities? The 90s were wild—back when security was just a suggestion and the most sophisticated cyber attack was basically saying "please" to the server. Modern security pros looking at this are probably crying into their 64-character randomly generated passwords right now. Meanwhile, Microsoft was probably like "eh, good enough" when designing their authentication system. The golden age when you could become an elite hacker during your lunch break!