Javascript Memes

Modern devs out here with 16GB of RAM, gaming PCs that could render the entire universe, PS5s, and somehow still manage to make Electron apps that eat memory like it's an all-you-can-eat buffet. Meanwhile, legends back in the day were crafting entire operating systems and games on 2MB of RAM with hardware that had less computing power than today's smart toaster. The contrast is brutal: we've got 8,000x more RAM and yet Chrome tabs still bring our machines to their knees. Those old-school devs were writing assembly, optimizing every single byte, and shipping masterpieces on a PlayStation 1 and Super Nintendo. They didn't have Stack Overflow, npm packages, or the luxury of importing 500MB of node_modules to display "Hello World." The SpongeBob meme format captures it perfectly: modern devs looking sophisticated with all their fancy hardware versus the raw, unhinged genius of developers who had to make magic happen with constraints that would make today's engineers weep. Respect to those who coded when memory management wasn't optional—it was survival.

Someone asks you to name every computer ever. Instead of actually naming them, just iterate through an array and reassign every computer's name to "ever". Problem solved. Technically correct, which is the best kind of correct. This is what happens when you let developers interpret requirements literally. The challenge was to "name every computer ever" but they heard "rename every computer TO ever". It's like when your PM asks for better error handling and you just wrap everything in try-catch and call it a day. Peak malicious compliance energy right here.

When your error handling is so robust it involves throwing babies across a canyon. The try block launches Baby(), the catch block is desperately reaching to handle it, and the finally block? Just sitting there at the bottom, guaranteed to execute whether the baby gets caught or not. The finally block doesn't care about your success or failure—it's just there to clean up resources and probably call CPS. The visual metaphor here is chef's kiss: the sheer distance between try and catch represents that one function in your codebase where the exception could come from literally anywhere in a 500-line method, and you're just hoping your generic catch block somehow handles it gracefully. Meanwhile, finally is down there like "I'm running regardless, hope you closed those database connections."

Nothing quite like having a principal dev who's been maintaining that legacy COBOL system since the Reagan administration get schooled by the 23-year-old who just finished a React bootcamp. The confidence of fresh grads who think their 6 months of JavaScript experience qualifies them to refactor a battle-tested system that's been running production for 15 years is truly something to behold. Meanwhile, the senior dev is standing there thinking about all the edge cases, technical debt, and production incidents that aren't covered in the latest Medium article the junior just read. But sure, let's rewrite everything in the framework-of-the-month because "it's how it's done now."

When your project manager asks for a demo and you've spent three sprints perfecting the CSS animations while the backend is literally held together by duct tape and prayer. The building looks absolutely pristine from the street view—nice paint job, decent windows, professional facade. Then you walk around back and realize the entire structure is one strong breeze away from becoming a physics lesson. This is every startup's MVP where the frontend devs got a bit too excited with their Tailwind configs and React animations while the backend team is still arguing about whether to use MongoDB or PostgreSQL. The API endpoints? They exist in theory. The database schema? "We'll normalize it later." The authentication system? "Just hardcode an admin token for now." But hey, at least it looks good on the landing page, right? The investors will never scroll down to see the 500 Internal Server Error hiding behind that beautiful gradient button.

Nothing screams "legacy codebase" quite like a footer that still says "© 2022" in the year 2025. The irony here is beautiful: a product claiming to solve the problem of outdated copyright years... while displaying an outdated copyright year in its own footer. It's like a fitness app with a broken step counter or a spell-checker with typos in its marketing. The real kicker? They're marketing this as "Product of the day 46th" while simultaneously proving they need their own product. Either they haven't launched yet, or they're running the most meta marketing campaign in history. Pro tip: if you're selling a solution to automatically update copyright years, maybe start by using it on your own site. Just a thought.

Someone woke up and chose violence against Electron apps, and honestly? They're spitting facts. The rant reads like a manifesto written by someone who just watched Slack consume 4GB of RAM to display text messages. The whole "webapps were not supposed to have life-altering effects" bit hits different when you realize we're literally running entire operating systems inside Chrome just to display a to-do list. We went from "write once, run anywhere" to "download 300MB just to check your email." And that Telnet joke? Chef's kiss. Because apparently wrapping a website in Chromium and calling it "native" is somehow more secure than protocols from the 70s. At least Telnet was honest about its lack of security. The kicker is the "REAL Web Development" gaslighting at the end. Yeah, building a 500MB Discord client that's just a glorified browser wrapper is definitely what Tim Berners-Lee envisioned when he invented the web. We've been played harder than a fiddle at a bluegrass festival.

Copy-paste a single fetch() call to OpenAI's API with someone else's prompt template? Congratulations, you're now an "AI expert" with a LinkedIn bio update pending. The bar for AI expertise has never been lower. Literally just wrapping GPT-4 in an API call and stringifying some JSON makes you qualified to speak at conferences apparently. No understanding of embeddings, fine-tuning, or even basic prompt engineering required—just req.query.prompt straight into the model like we're playing Mad Libs with a $200 billion neural network. The "Is this a pigeon?" energy is strong here. Slap "AI-powered" on your resume and watch the recruiter messages roll in.

Forget your fancy synthetic benchmarks and Crysis runs—the true test of any GPU's worth is whether it can render a photorealistic 3D rat at a smooth 165 FPS. Because nothing says "cutting-edge graphics performance" quite like a chonky rodent spinning in the void. Someone actually built this as a WebGL benchmark tool, and honestly? It's more entertaining than watching progress bars. Your $2000 RTX 4090 better be able to handle those fur shaders, or what's even the point? The rat judges all. The top-left corner shows a glorious 165 FPS at 165 Hz—clearly running on hardware that respects the rat. If your machine can't handle the bigrat, maybe it's time to upgrade. Or just accept that you'll be stuck at 30 FPS looking at a slightly less majestic rodent.

The demon learns human language by saying printf and console.log. The demon enthusiastically shows off their new "Hello World" skills wrapped in body tags. Then someone drops the "HTML is not a programming language" truth bomb and the demon gets absolutely obliterated at light speed. The demon literally tried to flex with markup language. That's like showing up to a programming competition with a PowerPoint presentation. The speed of that destruction suggests this debate has claimed more lives than any actual demon ever could.

Junior dev says they'll handle errors. Yoda drops the holy trinity of exception handling: try-catch blocks and the often-forgotten finally clause. That look of existential dread in the last panel? That's the exact moment you realize your "I'll just log it" approach wasn't cutting it. Finally blocks execute regardless of whether exceptions occurred, perfect for cleanup operations like closing database connections or file handles. But let's be honest, most of us remember finally exists only when the code reviewer asks "but what about resource cleanup?"

Right-click, "View Source," and boom—an endless army of <div> tags staring back at you like Agent Smith clones. Semantic HTML? Never heard of her. Why use <section> , <article> , <nav> , or <header> when you can just slap a <div> on everything and call it a day? It's the duct tape of web development—works for everything, means nothing, and your screen reader is crying in the corner. Accessibility engineers everywhere just felt a disturbance in the force.