He Can Have My Data

The eternal battle between corporate streaming services and the high seas of piracy summed up in one perfect comparison. On one side: Pay $19.99/month for questionable 1080p quality, limited to 6 devices, and the warm fuzzy feeling that you're helping some CEO buy a third yacht. On the other: Get pristine 8K UHD BDRip for exactly $0, use it everywhere, enjoy the cultural enrichment of random Eastern European subtitles, and that reassuring disclaimer that definitely makes everything totally legal. The "it's literally a video, it can't have a virus" part is that special blend of technical naivety that's gotten many a developer's personal laptop reformatted after downloading "WandaVision.S01E09.FINAL.exe"

Ah yes, the classic "we broke something essential so now you need our premium feature" strategy. Vercel basically saying "Hey, our static generation doesn't work with security? Have you tried... not using static generation and paying us instead?" 🤔 For the uninitiated: CSP (Content Security Policy) is a crucial security feature that helps prevent attacks like XSS. But apparently making it work with static generation was too much trouble, so the solution is "just use our dynamic rendering instead!" Which, coincidentally, costs more money. What a shocking coincidence! It's the tech equivalent of a mechanic breaking your brakes then suggesting you buy a parachute.

Ah, the classic "did you type your password too quickly? DENIED!" scenario. Twenty years in this industry and websites are still pulling this garbage. Some frontend dev thought they were clever by checking how fast you type your password, as if speed equals automation. Meanwhile, the rest of us are just trying to log in before our coffee gets cold. The best part? The site doesn't even check if the password is correct - just that you didn't type it "suspiciously fast." Brilliant security theater from the same people who probably store your password as plaintext in a CSV file somewhere.

The C++ programmer's 3 AM nightmare in full display. First the Rust evangelists tell you your beloved language is "unsafe" and you need to switch. Then they warn that all your code will be rewritten in Rust anyway, so prepare for unemployment. Finally, the dream escalates to its horrifying conclusion: "QUIT HAVING FUN" – because how dare you enjoy your pointer arithmetic and manual memory management? It's the programming equivalent of vegans telling meat-eaters they'll die of heart disease while you're just trying to enjoy your steak. Meanwhile, the C++ dev lies awake, haunted by the thought that maybe – just maybe – they should learn Rust before their GitHub contributions become vintage artifacts in the Computer History Museum.

Ah, the classic SQL injection hack in job interview form. Guy answers "What's your name?" with something like Robert'); DROP TABLE Candidates; -- and the system just executes it, marking him as hired. The interviewer's confused face in the last panel is priceless. The sad part? After 20 years of SQL injection being a known vulnerability, I still find production code vulnerable to this exact attack every other Tuesday. Congrats on the job though, I guess your first task will be fixing their security.

Little Tim tried to hack his way onto the nice list with a SQL injection attack, but Santa's not having it. The kid literally tried to use INSERT INTO [NiceList] SELECT * FROM [NaughtyList];-- to move everyone from the naughty list to the nice list. The real kicker? Santa's running his operation on "several dozen interconnected Excel spreadsheets, like a professional." That's the most terrifying part of this whole scenario. Imagine tracking billions of children's moral behavior in Excel. Absolute nightmare fuel for any data engineer.