All Security Wants In Return Is To Bring Dev Into Compliance

Regular running is for amateurs. Running as Administrator gives you a fancy suit but similar results. But sudo ? That transforms you into a samurai warrior ready to slice through permission errors like butter. Nothing fixes a stubborn Linux problem quite like summoning your inner warlord with those four magical letters. Suddenly you're not asking the system nicely anymore—you're telling it what to do while wielding dual katanas of root privileges. The progression is beautiful. From jogger to businessman to absolute destroyer of file permission hierarchies. And they say violence isn't the answer...

Left: "It took me a few minutes to make BibleGPT with custom GPT. Now? 5 seconds with Devin." Right: "Who is doubting thomas" → "Sorry, an error occurred while fetching your answer." Bottom: "It exposed my API key so I had to revoke :(" The AI dev tool pipeline in 2024: Build something in 5 seconds, deploy it in 2 seconds, expose your API keys in 1 second. Progress! This is why we can't have nice things in tech. The faster we build, the faster we leak credentials. The modern developer experience is just speedrunning security vulnerabilities.

The AUDACITY of comparing your measly code oopsie to Rheinmetall's! 💀 When you "accidentally" test in production, you might crash a website. When a LITERAL WEAPONS MANUFACTURER does it, they're "testing" missiles and tanks in actual combat zones! Your bug: "Oops, the button is blue instead of green!" Their bug: "THE ENTIRE VILLAGE IS GONE!" The contrast between Mr. Incredible's goofy smile and that terrifying black-and-white face is sending me to another dimension. Catastrophic deployment failures have never been so hilariously different!

The perfect representation of Steam's age verification system! Steam asks if you're old enough to view mature content, you click "Yes" despite being 12, and Steam just... lets you right in. No ID check, no credit card verification—just pure digital trust in an era of zero trust architecture. It's basically the digital equivalent of a bouncer asking for ID and then immediately stepping aside when you say "trust me bro, I'm totally 18."

The tech industry's relationship with the word "open" is like that ex who said they wanted an "open relationship" but actually meant "I want to see other people while you stay committed." On the left, we've got "Open" VPNs with fine print that would make a lawyer blush: "free" (after you pay), "unlimited" (for exactly two people), and source code you can view from such a distance you'll need the James Webb telescope. And then there's "Open" AI on the right—about as open as Fort Knox during a security drill. "Open research" (coming never), "open models" (just trust us, bro), and an "open culture" where sharing is strictly forbidden. After 15 years in tech, I've learned that "open" is corporate-speak for "we'll keep it open until we've captured enough market share to slam the door shut." Classic bait-and-switch, now with 100% more paywalls!

Ah yes, the entire digital world balanced precariously on a tiny Rust component. The tower of technical debt we've built would make the Tower of Babel look structurally sound. One small memory-safe language holding up billions in infrastructure and preventing the whole stack from imploding. No pressure. Just another day where we're all one misplaced semicolon away from digital armageddon. But hey, at least it's memory-safe.