Architecture Memes

Posts tagged with Architecture

I Still Call Them Services And They Forgot The A

I Still Call Them Services And They Forgot The A
Someone asks if a mysterious black box has demons in it. The response? "Yea but they're based." Another person questions what they're based on, and the answer is simply: "C++." The joke is a play on "microservices" vs "microdaemons" (daemons being background processes in Unix/Linux, pronounced like "demons"). The title references how people still call them "services" instead of the technically correct "daemons"—and jokes that they forgot the 'A' in daemon. But the real gold here is the "based" pun. In tech, we say something is "based on" a technology (like "based on C++"), but the internet slang "based" means being unapologetically yourself. So when someone asks if it has demons, the answer works on both levels: yes it has daemons (background processes), and yes they're based (written in C++). Chef's kiss of a double entendre. The fact that C++ is the foundation makes it even funnier—because of course the demons would be written in the language that's basically controlled chaos with pointers.

Just Reuse The Class Bro

Just Reuse The Class Bro
Someone really looked at their codebase and said "let's make one class do literally everything." Entity, DTO, Domain Model, API Contract, AND Kafka Message? That's not code reuse, that's architectural Stockholm syndrome. Sure, you saved yourself from writing a few mappers, but now your database entity knows about your message broker, your API exposes internal IDs, and your domain logic is coupled to JSON serialization annotations. Good luck explaining to the new junior why changing a Kafka field breaks the database migration. The tears in that meme? Those are from the poor soul who has to refactor this nightmare six months later when requirements change. Separation of concerns died so you could avoid writing three extra classes.

The Truth Is Watching Me

The Truth Is Watching Me
You know that feeling when you're in the standup meeting confidently calling it a "microservice" while internally screaming because it's basically a distributed monolith wearing a fancy hat? That nervous side-eye says it all. Your so-called microservice has more endpoints than a porcupine has quills, shares a database schema with everything else (violating every principle of service independence), and has "modules" that are just glorified folders pretending to be separate concerns. It's like calling a studio apartment a "luxury multi-zone living space." The worst part? Everyone on the team knows, but nobody wants to be the one to say "hey, maybe we should refactor this before it becomes sentient and enslaves us all." Instead, you just keep adding more endpoints and praying the database doesn't become the single point of failure it was always destined to be.

I Hate Whoever Makes Decisions At Our Org

I Hate Whoever Makes Decisions At Our Org
Classic case of "let's solve the problem by creating another problem." You've got 14 competing auth tools causing chaos, so naturally the galaxy-brain solution is to build a 15th one that'll somehow unite them all. Spoiler alert: it won't. Every senior dev has lived through this nightmare. Some architect gets promoted, reads one Medium article about "unified authentication layers," and suddenly you're spending six months building Yet Another Auth Tool™ that'll be abandoned halfway through when they pivot to microservices or whatever's trending on HackerNews that quarter. Meanwhile, the 14 existing tools continue doing their thing, your new "universal" solution gets adopted by exactly one team (yours, begrudgingly), and the cycle continues. But hey, at least someone got their promotion out of it.

When Architecture Compatibility Is Your Side Hustle

When Architecture Compatibility Is Your Side Hustle
Ah, the miracle of emulation. Valve somehow convinced x86 apps to play nice with ARM architecture, which is basically like getting cats and dogs to not only coexist but form a barbershop quartet. The Steam Machine announcement feels like that moment when your coworker says they refactored the entire codebase over the weekend and "it just works." Sure, buddy. Next you'll tell me PHP is secure and printers never jam.

The DevOps Balancing Act

The DevOps Balancing Act
OH. MY. GOD. This is the MOST ACCURATE representation of DevOps life I've ever witnessed! 😱 Those poor souls desperately trying to keep those colorful ball pits separated are LITERALLY every DevOps engineer who's ever lived! They're frantically holding back the tide as if their careers depend on it (spoiler alert: THEY DO). One wrong move and BOOM - those beautiful, independent microservices collapse into the dreaded monolith from hell! The absolute NIGHTMARE of watching your carefully crafted architecture turn into one giant, unmaintainable disaster! The irony is just *chef's kiss* - we broke up monoliths to make life easier, and now we're dying trying to keep them from secretly reforming behind our backs. It's like architectural whack-a-mole with our sanity as the mallet!

Average Linux User's House (No Windows Installed)

Average Linux User's House (No Windows Installed)
BEHOLD! The architectural manifestation of a Linux user's UNDYING COMMITMENT to their operating system! A house so militantly anti-Microsoft it literally has ZERO windows! Just solid walls of impenetrable concrete because WHY would you need natural light when your terminal has that gorgeous green-on-black glow?! The owner probably enters through some obscure SSH tunnel that requires 17 different authentication methods and a blood sacrifice. Neighbors complain about hearing manic keyboard clacking at 3 AM followed by screams of "I COMPILED MY OWN SUNLIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH!"

The Real Reason Behind Onion Architecture

The Real Reason Behind Onion Architecture
The truth finally revealed by a battle-scarred architect! Onion Architecture isn't named for its elegant layers of separation and dependency flow. Nope. It's named for the tears you'll shed when some junior dev decides that direct database access from the UI layer is "more efficient." Nothing says "architectural integrity" like finding repository implementations scattered across 47 different projects because "inheritance was too complicated." The real layers of the onion are just varying depths of developer suffering.

Frontend Hiding The Chaos Behind

Frontend Hiding The Chaos Behind
The classic software development glow-up! Backend code is the disheveled guy with his shirt untucked and vest askew—basically held together with duct tape, regex, and prayers. Meanwhile, the frontend code gets a professional photoshoot with perfect lighting and styling. And finally, what users actually see? A polished, smiling interface that gives zero hints about the eldritch horrors lurking in the codebase. It's like putting a designer suit on a server that's literally just a potato connected to a car battery.

Frontend Vs Backend: A Concrete Metaphor

Frontend Vs Backend: A Concrete Metaphor
Behold, the architectural representation of every web project ever! The outer buildings (frontend) stand tall and proud with their brick facades, while the center courtyard (backend) is just a muddy pit of despair. That beautiful UI you spent weeks perfecting? Ready to launch! The database structure and API endpoints that actually make it functional? Still a swampy mess where dreams go to die. Nothing quite captures the essence of modern development like a gorgeous login page that connects to absolutely nothing. "But it looks great on my portfolio!" —said every frontend dev while the backend team contemplates a career in goat farming.

Some Developers Just Want To Watch The World Burn

Some Developers Just Want To Watch The World Burn
Microservices architects watching their monolith burn while explaining message queues is peak chaotic energy. Just like the Joker, they don't care about your synchronous API calls—they just want to watch the system decouple in glorious asynchronous flames. The real punchline? When everything crashes because someone forgot to set up a dead letter queue. Some developers just want to watch the world burn... one RabbitMQ message at a time.

The Modern Software Stack Nightmare

The Modern Software Stack Nightmare
Ah yes, the "modern" software stack—where simplicity goes to die and your resume gets a steroid injection. What started as "I just want to build a website" has evolved into this technological fever dream where you need 47 different frameworks, 23 APIs, and a small data center just to display "Hello World." The real kicker? Half of these technologies will be deprecated by the time you finish reading this. Your frontend needs React, unless the client prefers Angular, or maybe Vue, or wait—is Flutter hot this week? Don't forget Tailwind because apparently regular CSS wasn't complicated enough. And look at that "optional" messaging layer that's somehow mandatory in every architecture review. Nothing says efficiency like having Kafka, RabbitMQ, and SQS all running simultaneously because different teams couldn't agree on which one to use. The best part? Some poor soul will have to maintain this Jenga tower of dependencies while management wonders why projects take so long to complete.