Do You Guys Think Memory Efficiency Will Be A Trend Again

The ultimate dad joke of programming languages! Despite sharing zero DNA with Java, JavaScript was named purely for marketing hype in the 90s. It's like naming your hamster "Tiger" because it sounds cooler. The sinister grin in the image perfectly captures Netscape's devious marketing team knowing they were about to confuse generations of developers with this naming atrocity. The relationship between Java and JavaScript is basically the same as car and carpet – superficially similar words describing completely unrelated things. Yet here we are, 25+ years later, still explaining to non-programmers that no, we can't fix their Java problem with our JavaScript skills.

Content 6 Locked. There are disputes about this answer's content being resolved at this time. It is not currently accepting new interactions. 4406 V You can't parse XHTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-rege questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Rege queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and rege go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The center cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the transgression of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of corrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radianc destroving all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking from your eyes like liquid pain, the song of regular expression parsing will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see it it is beautiful the final snuffing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pony he comes he comes he comes the ichor permeates all MY FACE MY;FAC h god no NO NOOOO NO stop the an' les ap notresi ZGO iS TONg THE PONY, IF COM Have you tried using an XML parser instead?

The IQ bell curve showing people on both extremes making the same syntax error is peak programming culture. The average coders (IQ 100) are sweating bullets over missing semicolons, while both the "barely functioning" and "genius" programmers are casually making the same mistake. Meanwhile, the employed dev at the bottom is completely lost—like when a senior dev walks into a room of junior devs arguing about whether tabs or spaces are superior. That magical moment when you realize some people are overthinking simple syntax while others have transcended to worrying about actual problems.

React devs flexing with their minimalist docs while Angular devs need a forklift to carry their API documentation. React keeps it simple with hooks and components, meanwhile Angular requires you to understand dependency injection, decorators, modules, services, observables, and approximately 47 different lifecycle hooks before you can render "Hello World". Sure, React might have its own ecosystem chaos, but at least you don't need a PhD to read the docs. Sometimes less really is more—unless you're an Angular developer who enjoys the smell of freshly printed documentation in the morning.

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually coded the entire value of π using variable names that spell out "negative eight"! 🤯 This absolute GENIUS created a JavaScript abomination where they've defined a bunch of constants with seemingly random fractional values, then multiplied them together in a way that spells out "negative eight" but ACTUALLY calculates π! The comment even brags it "works for -11 to 11" like they've created some mathematical masterpiece while committing crimes against code readability! This is what happens when math nerds get bored on a Tuesday afternoon. Somewhere, a code reviewer is having a nervous breakdown.

Content FRONTEND DEVS designboom meet project primrose, adobe's real-life interactive dress that changes design every