I Would Rather Die Of Thirst

The ultimate dev hypocrisy journey! 🤣 Starts with Patrick boldly declaring "I WON'T USE C#. MICROSOFT IS EVIL" while sitting comfortably in his armchair of moral superiority. But then... the slippery slope begins! First TypeScript (also by Microsoft), then VSCode (Microsoft again!), then GitHub Copilot (guess who? MICROSOFT!), followed by npm package manager, LinkedIn (yep, Microsoft owns that too), and finally surrendering completely to GitHub (100% Microsoft-owned). It's the perfect representation of that developer who swears they'll never touch Microsoft products but ends up completely surrounded by them anyway. The cognitive dissonance is REAL! We're all just SpongeBob pretending we have principles while swimming in Microsoft's ocean! 💀

Ah, the classic programming love story that was doomed from the start. She returns values, he doesn't return anything – basically the relationship equivalent of sending texts and getting left on read. The compiler warned him they were incompatible, but he disabled warnings with -w and compiled anyway. Their entire relationship was just her waiting for him to return something meaningful while he just... existed. And people wonder why programmers have commitment issues.

Ah, the classic "checking if a number is even" function written by someone who clearly slept through the modulo operator lesson. Instead of the simple return number % 2 == 0 , this poor soul is writing out every possible case until they presumably die of old age around number 2,147,483,647. This is the programming equivalent of digging a tunnel with a spoon when there's a perfectly good excavator sitting right there. The desperate tweet above the code says it all - there IS an easier way, buddy. There always is.

The left side shows all the fancy modern game development tools - Unreal Engine, Unity, powerful programming languages, and sophisticated 3D modeling software. Meanwhile, on the right side, there's just "6502 Assembly" - the programming language from the 1970s used in ancient systems like the Atari and Commodore 64. It's like comparing Olympic shooters - the one on the left has access to every cutting-edge tool in game development, while the one on the right is basically coding on a calculator with a rusty nail. And yet somehow that Assembly programmer still ships games that people actually finish playing instead of waiting for 50GB day-one patches.

The ultimate flex in programming isn't driving a Mercedes—it's using 32 bits when 1 would do just fine. Sure, booleans only need a single bit to represent true/false, but why be efficient when you can waste 31 extra bits using an integer instead? Memory optimization? In this economy? Please. We've got terabytes of RAM now. The same developers who argue over 5KB in a JavaScript library will happily burn 32x the memory for every boolean value because changing the data type now requires actual work. It's the digital equivalent of using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame—technically works, but your walls (and your code) will never forgive you.

The programming paradigm hierarchy in its natural habitat. Object-oriented programmers confidently standing tall, data-oriented programmers clinging to them for support, and return-oriented programmers... well, they've fallen into the bucket and can't get out. Classic case of function returning to the wrong address space. That rabbit's not coming back with a value anytime soon.