Job hunting Memes

That moment when you're so desperate for a job that you show up to an interview knowing absolutely zilch about the company. Zero research. Didn't even Google them. Just vibing with pure confidence and a prayer. The chicken walking into KFC is peak irony—completely oblivious to the fact that this might not end well. But hey, rent is due and those LeetCode mediums aren't going to pay the bills. Sometimes you just gotta wing it (pun absolutely intended) and hope your "tell me about yourself" monologue carries you through.

So you're telling me this "Super SWE" role wants someone who's done something remarkable, ships features before breakfast, has "undeniable proof-of-talent," believes in manifesting physical engineering futures, AND has built exceptional UIs... but LinkedIn can't even generate a job match summary because there's not enough information? Classic. The job requirements read like a tech bro's fever dream written at 3 AM after watching too many startup documentaries. "Go from 0 → 1 on an idea before breakfast" – buddy, I can barely go from 0 → 1 cup of coffee before breakfast. And "manifesting the future of physical engineering"? What is this, a software job or a TED talk audition? Over 100 people clicked apply though. Either everyone's delusional about their qualifications or we're all just that desperate for remote work. Probably both.

When your LinkedIn profile is so barren you're out here listing campus tours as education credentials. "Stanford University - 45 minute campus tour (Was not accepted)" is the professional equivalent of putting "I know a guy who knows Python" on your resume. The brutal honesty is actually respectable though - most people would just leave it vague or conveniently forget to mention the rejection part. But nah, this person went full transparency mode: "Yes, I was there. No, they didn't want me. Still counts, right?" It's like adding "Visited Google headquarters cafeteria" under work experience. The fact they even bothered to include the year makes it even funnier - like they're documenting their rejection for posterity. At least they got 10 experiences to show off, which is 10 more than my GitHub contributions this month.

You know those brain-teaser interview questions that have nothing to do with the actual job? Yeah, this person gets it. The classic "three switches, one bulb" puzzle is the kind of thing interviewers love to throw at you to "test your problem-solving skills" while you're sitting there thinking about the 47 GitHub repos you could be contributing to instead. The savage response is chef's kiss—basically saying "I'd rather be literally anywhere else than solving your riddle that has zero relevance to whether I can write clean code or debug a production incident at 3 AM." Because let's be real, when was the last time you had to figure out which switch controls a light bulb in a separate room during a deployment? Spoiler: never. It's the perfect encapsulation of how broken tech interviews have become—asking candidates to solve puzzles that Einstein would find tedious instead of, you know, actually assessing their ability to do the job. But hey, at least it weeds out people who have better things to do with their time.

The tech industry's favorite paradox: "Entry-level position, must have 5+ years of experience." Because apparently you should've been coding in the womb and shipped production apps during kindergarten. Recruiters out here demanding senior-level expertise for junior-level pay, then wondering why nobody's applying. It's like asking for a Lamborghini at Honda Civic prices. The job market has been doing this nonsense for years, creating impossible requirements that even the hiring managers themselves couldn't meet when they started. Pro tip: If you see this in a job posting, apply anyway. Half those "requirements" are just HR playing fantasy football with qualifications they don't understand.