The Hardcoding Grandmaster's Gambit

Content No text found in image

Content PYTHON JAVA KOTLIN

Content 6 Locked. There are disputes about this answer's content being resolved at this time. It is not currently accepting new interactions. 4406 V You can't parse XHTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-rege questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Rege queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and rege go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The center cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the transgression of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of corrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radianc destroving all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking from your eyes like liquid pain, the song of regular expression parsing will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see it it is beautiful the final snuffing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pony he comes he comes he comes the ichor permeates all MY FACE MY;FAC h god no NO NOOOO NO stop the an' les ap notresi ZGO iS TONg THE PONY, IF COM Have you tried using an XML parser instead?

You ask for a simple true or false , and suddenly you're parsing "Yes", "yeah", "Y", "true", "1", "ok", or my personal favorite: "success". The contract was clear—return a boolean. Instead, you get back a string that requires a whole new layer of validation logic. Now you're sitting there writing if (response.toLowerCase() === "true" || response === "1") like some kind of type-system archaeologist. Strong typing exists for a reason, people! The smugness on that kid's face? That's the exact energy of someone who just returned "False" with a capital F from an API endpoint.

The classic "I'll just roll my own" energy right here. Using random , time , or os modules for random number generation? That's for normies who understand entropy and cryptographic security. Real chads hardcode their RNG by... wait, what? Just picking a number and calling it random? The top panel shows the sensible approach—leveraging well-tested external modules that actually use system entropy, hardware noise, or timing jitter to generate proper random numbers. The bottom panel? That's the developer who thinks return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll. guaranteed to be random. is peak engineering. It's deterministic chaos masquerading as randomness, and honestly, it's the kind of confidence that breaks cryptographic systems and makes security researchers weep into their coffee. Pro tip: If your random number generator doesn't involve at least some external entropy source, you're basically just writing fan fiction about randomness.

Oh honey, the AUDACITY of semicolons showing up in Python code! While every other language is out here spamming semicolons like it's going out of style, Python users are living their best life with clean, minimalist syntax. Then some cursed soul drops a semicolon in their Python file and everyone loses their minds. The sheer HORROR on that face says it all – it's like watching someone put pineapple on pizza, except somehow worse. Python's whole vibe is "we don't do that here" energy, and semicolons are basically the programming equivalent of showing up to a black-tie event in Crocs.