Bad practices Memes

Putting All Your Eggs In One Basket

18 hours ago 164.0K views 0 shares

The classic single point of failure scenario. Server goes down, and naturally the backup is stored on... the same server. It's like keeping your spare tire inside the car that just drove off a cliff. Some say redundancy is expensive, but you know what's more expensive? Explaining to management why the last 6 months of data just evaporated because someone thought "the server is pretty reliable though" was a solid disaster recovery plan. Pro tip: your backup strategy shouldn't require a séance to recover data.

Should I Just Update The Mock Data With His Details And Reply That We Have Fixed It

Security Webdev Programming Debugging Testing

1 day ago 201.8K views 0 shares

Should I Just Update The Mock Data With His Details And Reply That We Have Fixed It

When someone reports a CRITICAL security vulnerability where they got auto-logged into Miles Morales' account without authentication, and your first instinct is "hmm, maybe I should just update the mock data with the reporter's name so it LOOKS like it's working correctly?" 💀 Imagine the absolute AUDACITY of this solution. "Oh no, our authentication is completely broken and people can access random accounts? Quick! Let's just make sure when THEY access it, it shows THEIR name! Problem solved!" It's like putting a "Wet Floor" sign on the Titanic while it's sinking. The developer really said "security vulnerability? more like security opportunity to demonstrate my creative problem-solving skills" and honestly? That's the kind of chaotic energy that keeps QA teams employed forever.

Overflow X Hidden

Frontend Webdev Programming Debugging

4 days ago 117.8K views 0 shares

Got a tiny horizontal scroll bar ruining your perfectly aligned layout? Just slap overflow-x: hidden on it and call it a day. Problem solved, right? Wrong. Sure, the scroll bar disappears, but so does half your content when users resize their browser. That dropdown menu you spent 3 hours positioning? Gone. The mobile nav that slides in from the side? Clipped into oblivion. But hey, at least there's no horizontal scroll anymore. The !important flag really seals the deal here—because why fix the root cause when you can just nuke it from orbit and make it impossible for anyone else to override later? Future you will definitely thank present you for this one. This is the CSS equivalent of duct taping your check engine light instead of taking your car to a mechanic.

I Would Like To Have A Word With You

Linux Devops Programming Debugging

6 days ago 178.1K views 0 shares

Listen, if you're storing binary data in your home directory config files, you've earned yourself a one-way ticket to the deepest, darkest corner of developer purgatory. Like, what possessed you to think "hmm, yes, let me just casually dump some compiled executables or image files into my ~/.config directory"? Config files are supposed to be TEXT. Human-readable TEXT. The kind you can open with vim at 3 AM when everything's on fire and actually UNDERSTAND what's happening. But no, you decided to play chaos agent and now nobody can debug your cursed setup without a hex editor and a prayer. Even the villain from Inglourious Basterds is judging you, and that's saying something.

My Code Is Self Documented

Programming Debugging Frontend Backend

7 days ago 172.2K views 0 shares

You know that developer who swears their code is "self-documenting" because they used variable names like x , data2 , and doStuff() ? Yeah, reading their code is basically archaeology. You're standing there like Indiana Jones trying to decipher ancient hieroglyphics, except instead of unlocking the secrets of a lost civilization, you're just trying to figure out why they nested seven ternary operators inside a forEach loop. "Self-documenting" is code for "I was too lazy to write comments and now you're going to suffer." Spoiler alert: your clever one-liner that saves three lines of code isn't clever when it takes 30 minutes to understand. Write the damn comments.

More Code = More Better

Programming Algorithms Debugging

11 days ago 230.0K views 0 shares

Behold, the evolution of a developer's brain slowly melting into absolute chaos! We start with the innocent x = 10 and somehow end up at a do-while loop that generates random numbers until the universe accidentally spits out 10. Because why use one line when you can gamble with the RNG gods and potentially loop until the heat death of the universe? The "Better" version adding ten ones together is giving strong "I get paid by lines of code" energy. The "Good" version with a backwards for loop that decrements from 0 is just... *chef's kiss* of unnecessary complexity. But the "Pro" move? That's weaponized inefficiency right there. Nothing screams senior developer quite like turning a constant assignment into a probability problem that could theoretically run forever. Your CPU will LOVE you!

How Real Programmers Handle Bugs

Debugging Programming

16 days ago 311.4K views 0 shares

Classic move: when the compiler catches your divide-by-zero, just give it a variable name and suddenly it's "intentional." Because nothing says "I know what I'm doing" like wrapping your runtime exception in a slightly fancier package. Top panel: direct division by zero, compiler's all confident and screaming at you. Bottom panel: same exact bug, just with extra steps and a variable declaration. Compiler suddenly gets polite and respectful, like you've unlocked some secret knowledge. Spoiler alert: your program still crashes at runtime. You didn't fix anything—you just moved the explosion from compile-time to production. But hey, at least it compiled, right? Ship it.

Excel As A Database? Straight To Jail

Databases Programming Backend

16 days ago 240.7K views 0 shares

You know you've committed a cardinal sin when even your fellow inmates want nothing to do with you. Using Excel as a database is like bringing a spoon to a knife fight – technically it works, but everyone's judging you. We've all seen it: some product manager or business analyst proudly managing 50,000 rows of "critical production data" in a shared Excel file on OneDrive. No version control, no data validation, no foreign keys, just pure chaos and merged cells everywhere. And don't even get me started on the inevitable "Excel_Final_v2_FINAL_USE_THIS_ONE.xlsx" situation. The prisoner's crime is so heinous that even hardened criminals recoil in horror. Murder? Acceptable. Tax evasion? Understandable. But Excel as a database? That's where society draws the line.

No Documentation

Programming Debugging Backend

23 days ago 238.6K views 0 shares

You know that feeling when you push 5,000 lines of undocumented spaghetti code to production on Friday afternoon, then drive away into the sunset with zero guilt? That's the energy here. No README, no comments, variable names like "x2" and "temp_final_FINAL_v3", and a codebase architecture only decipherable by archaeological carbon dating. The next developer who touches this will need therapy and a ouija board. But hey, not your problem anymore. You're already three exits down the highway, phone on silent, living your best life.

Client Side Validation

Javascript Webdev Security Programming Frontend

24 days ago 162.1K views 0 shares

So you're checking if an email is already taken by sending it to the server, getting back a list of all registered emails , and then doing a client-side .includes() check? That's like asking the bank to give you everyone's account numbers just to verify yours doesn't exist yet. Not only is this a massive security vulnerability (congrats, you just leaked your entire user database to anyone with DevTools open), but it's also hilariously inefficient. Why return an array of potentially millions of emails when the server could just return a boolean? The backend dev is probably crying somewhere. The cherry on top? After doing all this client-side "validation," you're still showing success messages without any actual server confirmation. Chef's kiss of terrible architecture. 🤌

Vibe Coder

Programming Webdev Frontend

26 days ago 224.6K views 0 shares

You know someone's coding purely on vibes when they start sprinkling emojis into their codebase like it's a text message to their bestie. Nothing screams "I have no idea what I'm doing but I'm having fun" quite like a `// TODO: fix this later 😅` comment or a variable named `isValid✅`. These are the developers who treat their IDE like a social media app, adding 🚀 to deployment scripts and 💀 next to buggy functions. Sure, your code might fail in production, but at least it'll fail with personality. The technical debt is real, but the aesthetic? *Chef's kiss* 👨‍🍳💋

Sounds A Bit Simple

Security Programming Python

27 days ago 153.3K views 0 shares

The classic "I'll just roll my own" energy right here. Using random , time , or os modules for random number generation? That's for normies who understand entropy and cryptographic security. Real chads hardcode their RNG by... wait, what? Just picking a number and calling it random? The top panel shows the sensible approach—leveraging well-tested external modules that actually use system entropy, hardware noise, or timing jitter to generate proper random numbers. The bottom panel? That's the developer who thinks return 4; // chosen by fair dice roll. guaranteed to be random. is peak engineering. It's deterministic chaos masquerading as randomness, and honestly, it's the kind of confidence that breaks cryptographic systems and makes security researchers weep into their coffee. Pro tip: If your random number generator doesn't involve at least some external entropy source, you're basically just writing fan fiction about randomness.

Browse