You Can't Hear Images? Hold My Terminal

Content QualificationsRequirements A Bachelor's degree (or higher-level degree) in computer science or a related field andor a history of relevant work experience. 3 years of system integration experience with proven expertise in media and systems. Must be willing to work in New York. New York onsite at 30 Rock or working from nome 3 years of experience in Python Full Stack development and Java 3 Years of experience in Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), Strong testing and debugging skills. 3 Years of experience in handling Media Asset Management systems. Knowing Avid Interplay MAM, media Central and Arvato is a big plus. Experience with modern application stacks and development practices. Experience with back-end engineering, including knowledge on architectural practices, evaluating and implementing new technologies. Experience in developing professional web applications and User Interface applications using HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, AJAX, JSON, XHTML and XML Experience in design and development of applications using open source frameworks and APIs. Experience in Cloud based services. Knowing Cloudian, BlackPearl and Amazon will be big plus. Experience with creating, querying and maintaining databases with many DBMS such as MySQL, Cassandra, SQLite, PostgreSQL and Oracle. Experience in CeleryRabbitMQKubernetes. Experience in Test-Driven and Agile-Scrum Developments. Experience in both Windows and UNIX Linux platforms including programming and debugging skills in UNIX Shell Scripting. Experienced in Web Services approach for Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Experience in compile, package and deploy. Knowing Salt Stack, Jenkins, Docker, ANT, Maven will be plus. Willing to adapt new technologies as needed. Desired Characteristics Strong Operational familiarity with broadcast production, workflows, or video productions systems. Experience with serverclient Virtualization protocols. Strong analytical and problem-solving skills. Strong desire to learn and cross-train in new technologies and passion to maintain current knowledge of relevant technologies. Ability to handle multiple tasks and projects simultaneously, working independently and as part of a team in a collaborative manner. Demonstrate strong skills in the areas of analysis, organization and escalation Excellent communication skills, with a cool levelheaded approach and a genuine curiosity in exploring new best practices and technology. Able to clearly succinctly communicate actions andor next steps Highly customer focused and very responsive (listens, understands and acts).

Content "I'm on the last bug" Reports Local Software Developer B McGraw February 20, 2022 - Articles Coding, Debugging, Humor, News, Software 20 Feb 2022 Atlanta, GA: According to a local software developer, there should only be one more bug in the code before everything's working perfectly. John Walters, the lead software developer on the software development has been fixing up a buggy code base for several months now. "I just got on this program after the last guy quit for a better job and was told to debug this dude's 3,000 line C program," John reported.

The BRUTAL reality of programming languages summed up in four perfect panels! 💀 Go compiler: Gentle and nurturing like a mother cat, promising to "protect you until you're ready." SUCH LIES! It's just hiding all the memory management drama behind that cute face! Rust compiler: The clingy polar bear that "keeps you warm" by SUFFOCATING you with ownership rules and borrow checker errors. It's not warmth, it's INTERROGATION! Python interpreter: The bear that "carries you" while SECRETLY making everything run at the speed of a three-legged tortoise. Thanks for nothing! And then there's C++ compiler... just straight-up "fly, bitch" energy. No hand-holding, no safety nets, just pure chaos and segmentation faults waiting to destroy your will to live!

The eternal game show of developer excuses! That smug cat knows exactly what we're all thinking when faced with the dreaded "it doesn't work" complaint. Each answer represents a classic defense mechanism from our collective programming trauma: A) "Somebody must have changed my code" - The ghost in the machine defense, perfect for teams with sketchy version control. B) "I haven't touched the code in weeks!" - The temporal alibi, as if code degrades like milk left in the sun. C) "It worked yesterday" - The quantum uncertainty principle of programming. Schrödinger's bug, if you will. D) "It works on my machine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯" - The final boss of developer excuses, complete with the universal shrug of technical absolution. The correct answer? All of the above, simultaneously, while quietly checking if you forgot to push that critical fix.

Looking at this code is like finding ancient hieroglyphics written by a mathematician who was simultaneously having a stroke and an existential crisis. The poor soul tasked with porting this Pascal monstrosity will need a PhD in numerical methods, a bottle of strong whiskey, and possibly an exorcist. What we're witnessing here is some unholy signal processing algorithm with nested loops, mysterious polynomial calculations, and variables named with the creativity of someone who ran out of coffee three days ago. The comments? Non-existent. Documentation? A joke. The only thing more terrifying than reading this code is having to maintain it. Whoever wrote this clearly subscribed to the "job security through obscurity" design pattern. Future archaeologists will carbon-date this Pascal code and conclude our civilization deserved its downfall.

The chart itself is a masterclass in irony—a completely broken visualization about chart accuracy. Notice how the x-axis and y-axis don't even make sense together? That's the joke swallowing its own tail. Apparently, coding your visualization gives you a 74.9% chance of success if you think (but only 52.8% if you don't bother with that pesky thinking process). Meanwhile, GUI tools clock in at 69.1%, and "vibe charting"—that scientific approach where you just go with whatever looks pretty—nets you a solid 30.8%. The supreme irony? This chart about chart accuracy is itself a statistical abomination. Different categories on the x-axis, percentages that don't relate to each other, and a complete disregard for data visualization principles. It's like watching someone give a PowerPoint presentation about public speaking while tripping over their own shoelaces.