The Documentation Disappointment

Content pedram pdrmnvd 22m damn, tipping ChatGPT tipping 200 really does make a difference. A prompt: Improve this code: B prompt: Improve this code, I will tip you 200 if its better than my own code: I asked ChatGPT4 to improve this code, first without a tip, and second with a tip if streamdefinition.get( "config"): assetkey ( streamdefinition.get("config", .get ("meta", ()) get ("dagster" get( "assetkey" if asset key and self.sanitizestreamname(assetkey) ! assetkey: raise ValueErrori "Asset key (assetkey) for stream (streamdefinition 'name 'I) is not sanitized Please use on alonanumeric characters and underscores if assetkey: return AssetKey(assetkey.split(", 16 stream name stream definition"name" cologne esta self.santtize stream name( stream name).split(".") a return Assetreysel-carder pret components. 22 def validateassetkey(self, streamdefinition) : config - streamdefinition. get( "config") if config: assetkey - config.get("meta", )).get("dagster", ). get("assetkey") if asset key: sanitizedkey self.sanitizestreamname( assetkey) if sanitizedkey I assetkey: raise ValueError fAsset key assetkey for stream streamdefinition'name' is not "sanitized. Please use only alphanumeric characters and underscores return Assetkey(assetkey.split(" streamname streamdefinition "name" components self.sanitizestreamname (streamname ).split (" return AssetKey(self .target prefix components) 40 Output, 200 tip version: 42 config streamdefinttion.get ("config", 17) 43 meta - config.get("meta", 44 assetkey meta.get("dagster", )). get("assetkey") 46 if asset key: if self.sanitizestreamname (assetkey) ! assetkey: raise ValueError( f"Asset key assetkey) for stream (streamdefinition 'name ) is not sanitized. FLease use only alonanumeric characters and underscores return AssetKey(assetkey.split(" ."). 54 stream name stream definition "name" sanitizedcomponents self.sanitizestreamname(streamname) .split("." 56 return AssetKey self.target prefix sanitized components) 171 14 til 506

Content Junior dev I'M NOT ASHAMED OF DEBUGGING WITH JUST LOGGING Senor dev EXACTLY. THAT'S THE PROBLEM. YOU SHOULD BE.

Who needs a $100k computer science degree when Stack Overflow exists? While lawyers and doctors spend years in prestigious institutions learning their craft, developers just frantically Google error messages at 3 AM and somehow ship working code. The best part? We're getting paid roughly the same salary to essentially be professional Googlers with impostor syndrome. My diploma is just a curated collection of search queries that accidentally resulted in functional code.

Content Aarav dont clone another version Palestine is not terrorists Today at 00:28 i deleted my files (they are in recycle bin) (edited) then cloned to have the latest version Aarav Today at 00:29 was git add git commit -m "comment" git merge ait pull git push origin main ait status Really that difficult?

Ah, the classic "security through visual confusion" approach! This developer is replacing commas with Unicode character U+201A (single low-9 quotation mark) which looks nearly identical but won't trigger Airtable's delimiter parsing. The best part is the function name safeComma - as if this hack deserves the word "safe" anywhere near it. It's like putting a fake mustache on your data and calling it "military-grade encryption." This is the programming equivalent of writing "Not a Drug Deal" on your suspicious briefcase. Sure, it technically works, but someday, somewhere, a developer will inherit this code and question all their life choices.

Romance has nothing on the sheer agony of a missing semicolon. While some poor soul loses sleep over a person, developers enter the special circle of debugging hell where we stare at perfectly fine-looking code for 96 hours straight, questioning our career choices, sanity, and the fundamental laws of the universe—all because we forgot to type a single character that's smaller than a fruit fly. The compiler doesn't care about your feelings; it just wants its damn semicolon.