Token Resellers

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually asked ChatGPT to code the gender pay gap into existence! 😱 The absolute AUDACITY to create a function that multiplies a man's salary by 0.77 to get a woman's salary! This is like asking an AI to mathematically formalize inequality while wearing a suit and pretending it's just "realistic programming." The function is so brutally honest it might as well have variable names like "systematic_inequality" and "patriarchy_coefficient." Whoever prompted this probably also asks for functions to calculate how many kitchen appliances equal one sports car. 💀

The tech industry's selective standards are painfully real. They'll reject a fresh grad for not implementing some theoretical O(n) algorithm they'll never use again, but will happily throw billions at AI models running on brute-force compute that would make any algorithm professor have an existential crisis. For those who don't know, O(n) refers to linear time complexity - basically how efficiently an algorithm scales. Companies obsess over this in interviews then proceed to ignore efficiency completely when it comes to their shiny new toys. Next time you're rejected for not optimizing a binary tree traversal fast enough, just remember - somewhere a data center is melting the polar ice caps to generate a cat picture.

So we've gone from "It's just a tool" to "AI hacked 17 companies" in record time. Remember when we were worried about teenagers in hoodies? Now Claude is out here doing the work of an entire cybercrime syndicate while its creators act shocked. Next headline: "AI files its own LLC and applies for cybersecurity contracts with the companies it just hacked." The circle of digital life continues. The real punchline? Some product manager is probably adding "automated corporate hacking" to their AI's feature list right now. Enterprise plan only, of course.

Ah, the elusive "Vibe Coding" methodology — where you simply feel your way through the development process until everything magically works. This 4chan-style greentext perfectly captures the delusional fever dream of every desperate developer at 3AM: "What if I just... stop fixing things properly and let the universe sort it out?" The progression is just *chef's kiss*: from "code breaks" to "automate refactoring" (translation: let AI fix my mess) to the magnificent fantasy of "issues solve themselves" — because obviously, bugs are sentient and will commit suicide if ignored long enough. And that final line? "Everyone gets an individualized copy" is just corporate-speak for "it's not my fault if it explodes on their specific machine." Whoever made this clearly had a traumatic deadline experience and is now permanently damaged. Welcome to the club.

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of comparing AI prompt engineering to gambling is SENDING ME! 💀 Both involve throwing money at a system you barely understand, desperately hoping for that magical outcome while the house (or cursor) laughs all the way to the bank. You're either wasting time tweaking slot strategies or perfecting prompts for a function that could've been written in 20 minutes. And that last row? DEVASTATING TRUTH. Nothing says "professional developer" like spending 4 hours crafting the perfect prompt only to realize you've just been playing the world's nerdiest slot machine. The difference? At least gamblers KNOW they're gambling!

Oh. My. God. The DIABOLICAL GENIUS of tech execs playing 4D chess with our careers! 😱 First, they're all "AI will TOTALLY replace you programmers!" Then suddenly everyone's terrified of learning to code. Supply plummets. Demand stays the same. And BOOM – programmer salaries SKYROCKET to astronomical levels! It's the most beautiful, twisted supply-and-demand manipulation I've ever witnessed. And we're all just pawns in their evil little game! *dramatically faints onto keyboard*