The classic code review saga continues! The function claims to check if something is a valid number, but instead uses a regex that would make ancient monks weep. Meanwhile, the reviewer's profound feedback? "add period" to the comment. Because clearly, proper punctuation is what's going to save this regex abomination from summoning demons in production. Seven years of computer science education and a decade of experience just to argue about periods in comments while that regex sits there like a ticking time bomb. Priorities!

SWEET MERCIFUL CODE GODS! Someone actually wrote a bot that posts the EXACT SAME recycled jokes we see daily on r/ProgrammerHumor! 😱 This masterpiece of automation randomly selects from the greatest hits collection: "Linux > Windows," "JavaScript sucks," and my personal favorite "how to exit vim" (a question that has trapped developers in terminal purgatory since the dawn of time). The tragic part? This bot would ABSOLUTELY farm more karma than my actual coding projects. Why spend weeks building something useful when you can just scream "SEMICOLON MISSING" and watch the upvotes roll in? Programming culture is officially eating itself!

When the senior dev asks you to explain your code to a non-technical stakeholder, and suddenly you realize you don't actually understand what you built either. That moment when your elaborate JavaScript framework is just a glorified rubber duck – it looks impressive floating in the bath of your codebase, but you have no idea what it's actually supposed to do. The perfect representation of every technical interview where you confidently wrote something that worked by accident.