I Refuse To Learn This Command

The duality of every developer's GitHub profile. You fork these magnificent, architecturally complex repositories with thousands of stars—beautifully crafted frameworks, intricate libraries, sophisticated tools that took teams years to build. Meanwhile, your own repos? A calculator app. Maybe a to-do list if you're feeling ambitious. That minimalist white cube perfectly captures the stark simplicity of "yet another basic project" we all have gathering digital dust in our profiles. The contrast hits different when you realize you've forked React, TensorFlow, and the Linux kernel, but your pinned repositories are literally just arithmetic operations wrapped in a GUI. We're all out here pretending to be contributors to enterprise-grade software while our actual output is "calculator-app-final-v2-ACTUALLY-FINAL."

The eternal CI/CD death spiral in its natural habitat! What we're witnessing is the beautiful disaster of a developer's 48-hour wrestling match with GitHub Actions. Starting with existential dread ("god has abandoned us"), progressing through false hope ("fixed CICD finally"), then the desperate environment variable tweaking, config file adjustments, and finally the primal scream of "pls fix workflow :))))" – which is developer code for "I'm one failed build away from a career change." The commit messages tell the whole tragic story: ten commits over two days just to get a workflow running. The real kicker? That "fixed CICD finally it was literally 2 lines smh" – the universal experience of spending 8 hours debugging only to find you forgot a semicolon.

First panel: Developers screaming at git rebase like it's some kind of monster. Second panel: Violently attacking it anyway because the team lead said so. Third panel: Reluctantly doing a pull rebase because there's no other choice. Fourth panel: That weird dopamine hit when your commit history is suddenly all clean and linear instead of looking like spaghetti thrown at a wall. Fun fact: The average developer spends 43% of their career avoiding rebases until they finally try it once and become insufferable evangelists about it.

A street sign that says "NO REBASE" with a symbol prohibiting two cars from being on top of each other. The perfect metaphor for Git workflows where rebasing is forbidden and merging is the only acceptable way to integrate changes. That senior dev who set up the repo rules is probably the same person who put up this sign. Both will fight you to the death if you try to maintain a clean commit history.

Ah, the sacred unspoken rules of society! Don't ask women their age, don't ask men their salary, and for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT ask a developer what their commit messages actually mean. That cryptic "Fixed stuff" covering 47 file changes? The mysterious "It works now" with no explanation? The passive-aggressive "Finally fixed the stupid bug"? These are personal diary entries of pain, triumph, and existential crisis that shall remain forever unexplained. Inquiring about commit messages is like asking someone to explain their browser history. Some things are better left buried in the git log where they belong.

When your GitHub access gets revoked before HR even calls you. Nothing says "surprise career transition opportunity" like finding out you're fired through a Git permission error. The modern equivalent of coming to work and your keycard doesn't work anymore. At least they didn't just git push --force you out of existence entirely!