New Hire Cybersecurity Making Your Job Worse

When your login form helpfully suggests the exact email you were trying to keep private... from the person standing right behind you . Nothing says "security" like broadcasting Joe Smith's email to everyone in visual range while simultaneously reminding bobzimor that he's using someone else's password. That yellow highlight might as well be a neon sign saying "IDENTITY THEFT IN PROGRESS!"

That awkward moment when your kid's teacher can't pronounce "$2Y$10$UgTh9EyUvedMTndo0PvF4.YkZaHx6OsMirqjR6ApgAsnPrRikwBgs" during roll call. On the plus side, absolutely no one is stealing this kid's identity. The ultimate security-minded parent move: not using your kid's name as your password, but using your incomprehensible bcrypt hash as your kid's name. Modern problems require modern solutions.

When your security awareness training meets real-world application. Plugging in random USB devices is basically sending an engraved invitation to hackers saying "Please compromise my system, I've made it extra convenient for you." The classic security vulnerability: human curiosity. This is why security professionals develop eye twitches by age 30. The number of organizations compromised because someone found a mysterious flash drive in the parking lot is disturbingly high. At least malwarebytes caught it, which is more than we can say for the user's decision-making process.

Flash is the tech equivalent of a zombie apocalypse survivor. Adobe officially killed it in 2020, but here it is in 2025, crawling back from the grave with that red logo turned blue like it's wearing a disguise. "I lived, b*tches!" The number of legacy systems still running Flash is the real horror story here. Some ancient enterprise app is probably keeping the entire financial sector hostage with its Flash dependency. The developers who can maintain it are either retired or charging consultant rates that would make a surgeon blush.

The ultimate tech billionaire self-own! Elon confidently declares the Social Security database isn't de-duplicated, suggesting massive fraud... only to get absolutely demolished when someone points out he clearly has no idea how government databases work. The cherry on top? The "readers added context" feature on his own platform confirming that yes, the government does indeed use SQL. Nothing quite like spending $44 billion on a platform just so everyone can watch you get publicly schooled on basic database concepts. This is what happens when you skip Database 101 but still think you're qualified to critique government systems. Maybe next time Google "what is MySQL" before tweeting?

Checking if your "universally unique identifier" is actually unique by comparing it to a database of other UUIDs is like asking if your fingerprints are unique by pressing them against everyone else's fingers. The whole point of UUIDs is that they're generated to be mathematically unique without needing to check a central registry. With 2^128 possible combinations, you have better odds of winning the lottery while being struck by lightning... twice... on Mars.