Create A Strong Password

GASP! The absolute AUDACITY of this poll! 😱 A mere 0.8% think Microsoft understands consent while a STAGGERING 99.2% chose "Remind me in 3 days" - which is basically the digital equivalent of "I'm going to keep asking until you give me the answer I want!" It's like that pushy friend who keeps texting about their MLM opportunity even after you've blocked their number on SEVENTEEN different platforms! Microsoft's update notifications and privacy settings are basically that clingy ex who just CAN'T take a hint! The irony is so thick you could spread it on toast and call it breakfast!

Look at all these fancy apps you're allowed to install, and the IT admin's like "But for coding? Notepad++ is all you need, buddy!" That's like giving a chef a plastic knife and saying "What? It cuts, doesn't it?" Meanwhile, developers at other companies are using the coding equivalent of a fully-equipped kitchen with robot assistants. Nothing says "we value your productivity" quite like forcing you to code without syntax highlighting, auto-completion, or debugging tools. But hey, at least you've got Chrome to Google "how to quit job without burning bridges."

Ah, the classic CS student interpretation of "make a game." Instead of creating Pac-Man or Tetris, this brilliant mind went straight for digital self-destruction. The code randomly generates a number between 0 and 5, and if it's 1 (which has a 1/6 chance), it deletes your Windows system folder. Nothing says "game over" quite like bricking your operating system! The professor asked for a game, not digital Russian roulette with your computer's vital organs. At least they named the file honestly - the only thing missing is a comment that says "// Do not run this unless you hate your computer and future self."

When Google asks for a "strong password," and you take it literally with HTML tags. Technically correct—the best kind of correct. The password field contains <strong><h1>Password</h1></strong> which is indeed a very "strong" password according to HTML semantics. Security experts hate this one weird trick.

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute HORROR of what this junior dev just confessed! 😱 Changing your Git config to impersonate your senior devs and then pushing a bug to production?! That's not just coding crime—that's a full-blown IDENTITY THEFT CATASTROPHE! This poor soul thought they were just being clever, but they've basically committed the developer equivalent of framing someone for MURDER. The senior dev's face says it all—pure existential panic because guess who's getting blamed when everything crashes and burns? NOT THE INNOCENT-LOOKING CULPRIT! This is why we can't have nice things in software development. Trust? DESTROYED. Career? POSSIBLY OVER. Code review processes? CLEARLY NONEXISTENT!

Trust issues level 9000! When someone asks why IT professionals are difficult, here's your answer: driving two hours just to physically verify a server is powered on despite THREE people's assurances. Because in the server room, "trust but verify" isn't just a motto—it's a survival mechanism. That blinking LED is worth more than any verbal confirmation. Remote management tools? Sure, they exist... but nothing beats the sweet relief of pressing that cold metal power button yourself and whispering, "I knew it" when you were right all along.