Since We're All Unemployed

Ah yes, the eternal truth of software engineering. While normal people debate philosophy, programmers look at the same glass and immediately think "why are we using a 500ml container when we only need 250ml? This is wasting memory." You've allocated a buffer that's double the size you actually need, and now you're paying for it in both RAM and existential dread. Could've used a smaller glass, could've used a dynamic array that grows as needed, but no—someone on Stack Overflow said "just make it bigger to be safe" and here we are. The real kicker? That glass will never get resized. It'll sit there in production for 5 years, half-full, mocking every performance review where you promise to "optimize resource usage."

Content Not all disabilities look like this. Some look like this. ava ORACLE Not all disabilities are visible! Please don't be so quick to judge.

Content THERE IT SHOULD WORK NOW. 77 - every programmer ever

Content Doctors: Googling stuff online does not make you a doctor. Programmers:

Google removed JPEG-XL support from Chrome faster than you can say "deprecated," claiming nobody used it. But here's the kicker: nobody used it because they removed the support . Classic chicken-and-egg problem, except the chicken is Google and the egg is every web developer who now has to maintain it anyway because users won't stop uploading JPEG-XL files. It's like watching someone complain about having to cook dinner while actively throwing away all the kitchen appliances. Google's standing there with their arms crossed, annoyed that developers keep requesting support for a format that's objectively better (smaller files, better quality, actual transparency), but they killed it themselves. The audacity is chef's kiss level. Welcome to web development, where the standards are made up and browser support doesn't matter until it suddenly does.

Content '' and 'j in alphobets 'j' and 'i' in progromming