arrays Memes

Chill Language

7 days ago 264.6K views 0 shares

While other languages are having a complete MELTDOWN because you dared to put a string, an integer, and a float in the same array, JavaScript is just vibing like a Greek philosopher contemplating the meaning of existence. "Mixed types? Sure bro, throw in a function and an object while you're at it. I literally don't care." JavaScript's dynamic typing is basically the programming equivalent of "live and let live" – no type checking, no judgment, just pure chaotic acceptance. Meanwhile, statically-typed languages are out here crying tears of blood because you tried to mix your data types like some kind of programming anarchist. JavaScript said "type safety is a social construct" and honestly? It's living its best life.

Kyoto Train Station Has Zero Indexed Platforms

Programming

8 days ago 155.7K views 0 shares

Kyoto Train Station Has Zero Indexed Platforms

Finally, a train station designed by programmers. While the rest of humanity insists on starting their platform numbers at 1 like absolute savages, Kyoto Train Station said "nah, we're doing this right" and went with Platform 0. Every developer who's ever had to explain why arrays start at 0 to a confused product manager just found their spiritual homeland. The Japanese really do think of everything—they've got bullet trains that arrive on the second, toilets that play music, and now platforms that actually make sense to anyone who's written a for loop. Meanwhile, the rest of the world's train stations are out here living in 1-indexed chaos like it's still the Middle Ages.

I Will Probably Not Learn R Language

Programming Python

11 days ago 261.4K views 0 shares

Oh, so R is great for statistical computing? Cool, cool, cool. Array indices starting at 1? Absolutely not. The audacity! The sheer disrespect to every programmer who's been counting from zero since the dawn of time! Like, imagine being a data scientist trying to convince developers to learn R and then hitting them with "btw arrays start at 1 lol" – instant dealbreaker. It's giving MATLAB energy and nobody asked for that. The Joey Tribbiani face says it all: went from "okay I'm listening" to "yeah that's gonna be a hard pass from me, chief" in 0.5 seconds flat.

Learning Cpp As C With Classes

C++ Programming

16 days ago 124.0K views 0 shares

Welcome to C++, where arrays decay to pointers faster than your career expectations after reading legacy code. Someone just discovered that when you pass an array to a function, it immediately forgets its own size and becomes a humble pointer. No size information, no bounds checking, just raw pointer energy. So now you're stuck passing array sizes as separate parameters like it's 1972. Meanwhile, Python devs are over there with their .length property, sipping lattes, while C# folks have their nice Array.Length . But here you are, manually tracking array sizes like some kind of memory accountant. The "C with classes" nickname hits different when you realize Bjarne Stroustrup gave us templates, RAII, and move semantics, but somehow we're still manually babysitting array bounds in 2025. At least we have std::vector and std::array now... if you can convince your team to stop writing C code in .cpp files.

A A A

Programming C++ Javascript Python Java

22 days ago 273.1K views 1 shares

The eternal debate that splits the programming world harder than tabs vs spaces. Baby's first word is "A-a-a" and the proud parent thinks it's adorable... until some psychopath suggests that arrays should start at 1. Zero-indexing is sacred. It's not just tradition—it's mathematically elegant, it's how memory offsets work, and it's been the foundation of programming since the dawn of time. But then you've got languages like Lua, MATLAB, and R out here acting like index 1 is where life begins, and frankly, they deserve to be left in that dumpster. The horror on that parent's face perfectly captures every C, Python, Java, and JavaScript developer's reaction when they encounter a 1-indexed language. It's not just wrong—it's an affront to nature itself.

It's All There In The Specs, Bro

Javascript Webdev Programming

23 days ago 146.9K views 0 shares

So you're telling me that accessing an array with a negative index in JavaScript not only works but actually adds a property to the array? And then when you check the array, it shows you this cursed -1: 4 sitting there like it belongs? The bell curve perfectly captures the JavaScript experience: beginners think it's ridiculous (correct), experts also think it's ridiculous (also correct), but the middle crowd has Stockholm syndrome and will defend it with their lives. "It makes sense bro, everything in JS is an object!" Yeah, and that's exactly the problem. JavaScript treats arrays like objects because they are objects, so test[-1] = 4 is just adding a property named "-1" to your array object. It's technically in the spec, which somehow makes it worse.

JS Is A Very Respectable Language

Javascript Webdev Frontend

24 days ago 123.1K views 1 shares

JavaScript really said "consistency is for COWARDS" and honestly? It committed to the bit. 💀 So you've got an array [1, 2, 3] and you're like "hey what's at index -2?" JavaScript casually returns undefined because negative indices don't exist in JS arrays... EXCEPT when you use .at(-2) which is specifically designed to handle negative indices and suddenly it's like "oh you want the second element from the end? Here's your 2, bestie!" Then you assign foo[-2] = 4 which JavaScript happily accepts because arrays are objects and you just created a STRING property called "-2" on that array object. So now foo[-2] returns 4 from the object property while foo.at(-2) STILL returns 2 from the actual array position. Same syntax, completely different universes. Very respectable. Very normal. Nothing to see here. 🎪

The Horrifying Truth About JavaScript Arrays

Javascript Webdev Programming Frontend

1 month ago 168.1K views 0 shares

The Horrifying Truth About JavaScript Arrays

The moment when JavaScript's existential truth bomb hits you like a freight train. In JS, arrays are just objects where the keys happen to be sequential numbers! That calm developer on the left is about to have their entire worldview shattered with this realization. It's that special kind of programming horror when you realize your mental model of a fundamental data structure was a comfortable lie. Next thing you know, you're trying myArray["1"] instead of myArray[1] just to prove to yourself that reality is broken. Welcome to JavaScript, where arrays are objects, undefined is not null, and NaN !== NaN. Sweet dreams!

When You Start Using Data Structures Other Than Arrays

Algorithms Programming Debugging

1 month ago 178.8K views 0 shares

When You Start Using Data Structures Other Than Arrays

That moment when you've been forcing everything into arrays for years and suddenly discover linked lists, trees, and hash maps. The sheer existential horror of realizing how much unnecessary O(n) searching you've been doing. Your entire coding career flashes before your eyes as you contemplate all those nested for-loops that could have been O(1) lookups.

The Sins Of The Parent Codebase

Programming Algorithms Debugging

2 months ago 214.5K views 0 shares

The sins of the parent codebase are visited upon the child. That poor kid was doomed from the moment mom decided arrays should start at 1 instead of 0. It's like being born into a family that puts milk before cereal – fundamentally wrong at the core level. Some programming traumas just get passed down through generations, and starting arrays at 1 is the equivalent of digital hereditary trauma. The kid never stood a chance.

Zero-Based Child Prodigy

Programming C++ Algorithms Javascript Python

2 months ago 231.8K views 0 shares

The kid's already mastered zero-based indexing at age 7! While most humans start counting from 1, this tiny programmer instinctively numbers pages as 0, 1, 2... just like arrays in most programming languages. The parent might think it's cute artwork, but we're witnessing the birth of a future software engineer who intuitively understands that memory allocation starts at position 0. Nature vs nurture debate settled - some people are just born to code.

Yer A Programmer Harry

Programming Javascript Python Java

3 months ago 224.2K views 0 shares

The kid's already been corrupted by zero-indexing! That's not just numbering – that's programming numbering. While normal humans start counting at 1, this tiny developer is starting at 0, just like arrays in most programming languages. The parent's pride is completely justified – that child is destined for a life of explaining to non-technical people why the first element is actually the zeroth element. Future debugging sessions and off-by-one errors await this prodigy!

Browse