The IT Hero We Deserve, Not The One We Need

The moment your boss asks you to revisit that legacy codebase you abandoned six months ago. You swagger in confidently, only to discover your tests are as broken as your promises to "document everything properly next time." Red error messages as far as the eye can see. Time to mysteriously develop a sudden case of food poisoning.

Behold the accidental genius of setTimeout sorting! The code loops through an array and logs each value using setTimeout with the value itself as the delay. Since JavaScript's event loop processes timeouts in order of expiration, smaller numbers appear first in the console. Congratulations! You've invented the world's most inefficient sorting algorithm with O(max(array)) time complexity. The array magically appears sorted in the console, not because of any actual sorting logic, but because the browser's event scheduler is doing all the work. Somewhere, a computer science professor just felt a disturbance in the force.

The mythical "deadline-driven development environment." When your PM says "ship it yesterday" and you take it literally. This guy skipped the standing desk trend and went straight to sidewalk computing. He's either fixing a production bug at 3 AM or demonstrating the ultimate remote work setup. The best part? No office distractions, unlimited bathroom breaks (the whole world is your bathroom), and you can literally pass out after pushing to production. Extreme programming taken way too literally.

Ever been forced into "pair programming" by a manager who has no idea what coding actually involves? Yeah, that's not collaboration—that's just having five people breathing down your neck while Windows decides it's the perfect time for an update. The poor dev is just trying to code with an audience of managers expecting miracles while the system is literally unusable. And the best part? Someone's already mentally writing your obituary when you inevitably fail to "fix bug" during this corporate theater of the absurd. Pair programming works great in theory. In practice? It's just another word for "public execution by keyboard."

That moment of existential crisis when you realize you're either training your replacement or your future headache. Nothing like wondering if this new dev will be the one who actually reads documentation or just another copy-paste warrior who'll break production with Stack Overflow solutions. The real question isn't whether they're smart—it's whether you'll spend the next six months fixing their "creative interpretations" of your codebase.

The eternal cycle of developer disappointment: find a promising tutorial, only to discover it was written when dinosaurs roamed the internet. Nothing quite captures the soul-crushing despair of trying to follow instructions that reference libraries abandoned by their own creators. The best part? Spending 3 hours debugging just to realize the tutorial was written for a version that's now considered archaeological evidence.