Can You Explain The Gap In Your Resume?

Sure, your C++ code runs 100x faster... after you spent 100x longer writing it. That caveman dragging the scientist around is the perfect metaphor for C++ performance vs Python simplicity. Your friend's busy managing memory and fighting segfaults while you're sipping coffee after a casual import numpy . The torch might be impressive, but I'll take my 10 lines of readable code over your flaming monstrosity any day.

The left side shows all the ridiculous string types C++ developers have to deal with: str , String , OsStr , OsString , Path , PathBuf , Vec<u8> , &u8 , CString , CStr ... while the right side shows the elegant simplicity of just using char[] . It's like bringing a Swiss Army knife to a gunfight when all you needed was a bullet. The string handling complexity in modern languages vs. the old-school C approach is programming's version of "why use many word when few word do trick?"

The secret to longevity isn't diet or exercise—it's printf debugging! Mike here has made it to 92 by stubbornly refusing to use fancy debuggers or logging frameworks. While the rest of us are stressing over breakpoints and watch variables, he's peacefully inserting print statements like it's 1972. The man has probably typed "printf" more times than he's had hot dinners, and his code is littered with more debug statements than his lawn has blades of grass. Clearly, the fountain of youth flows with C syntax and terminal output. Next time someone suggests you "modernize your debugging approach," just point to Mike—the living proof that printf debugging isn't just a habit, it's a lifestyle choice with unexpected health benefits!

Oh. My. GOD. This is the programming equivalent of creating a monster that defies the laws of nature! 😱 Writing a JavaScript compiler in C++ is just Tuesday for hardcore devs, but a C++ compiler IN JAVASCRIPT?! That's like trying to fit an elephant into a matchbox while the matchbox is ON FIRE. The sheer AUDACITY of someone who would attempt such madness! They're not just playing with fire—they're juggling nuclear warheads while riding a unicycle across Niagara Falls. Whoever attempts this unholy abomination clearly has no fear, no boundaries, and probably no remaining sanity. Stay far, FAR away from that person at hackathons!

The comic brilliantly captures the special relationship between developers and compilers. Our poor protagonist keeps recompiling the same broken code, expecting different results—the literal definition of madness according to that famous quote. Meanwhile, deep in the compiler's realm, it's portrayed as tiny workers loading error dynamite into a catapult, asking "He recompiled the same code again, should we stop?" Spoiler alert: they never stop. The compiler will happily keep launching those errors at you until you actually fix something. The "#define MADNESS" at the top is just *chef's kiss* perfect C preprocessor humor.

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually wrote a function that checks if a deck is unique by comparing it to previous decks, loops through ALL 52 CARDS, and then... PLOT TWIST... returns true no matter what! 🤦‍♀️ The drama here is ASTRONOMICAL! That entire red section is just elaborate theater that does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It's like building an entire security system for your house but leaving the key under the mat with a neon sign saying "KEY HERE!" The function name promises uniqueness but delivers LIES. Trust issues? I have them now.