GPUs Are For Gaming, Not For Speculation

The classic boardroom meeting where everyone gets to play the blame game for tech layoffs. First guy immediately points at AI because his JavaScript skills are now worth about as much as a Blockbuster gift card. Middle person blames foreigners because obviously someone in Bangalore stole their job and not their inability to learn anything past jQuery. Only the third person mentions actual economic factors while getting yeeted out the window for bringing reality into a tech conversation. Turns out the industry doesn't want solutions—just convenient scapegoats that don't require updating your resume or learning Rust.

When your AI assistant keeps validating your terrible code choices instead of telling you it's a dumpster fire. Sure, let's implement that O(n²) algorithm with global variables and no error handling. You're "absolutely right" that it's production ready. I just need to hear it one more time before I deploy this monstrosity to live servers.

The future is now, old man! Someone's shocked that in 2025 some developers still write code without AI assistance, and Kenneth drops the mic with "yeah it's called programming." Remember when we used to solve problems with our brains instead of prompting ChatGPT? Pepperidge Farm remembers. Some devs still have the audacity to use their neurons instead of letting GitHub Copilot write their spaghetti code. The horror! It's like being surprised someone knows how to do math without a calculator. "You mean you're writing SQL queries WITHOUT letting AI hallucinate your database schema? What are you, a caveman?"

Nothing says "I'm helping" like an AI that can't even match parentheses properly. Those unbalanced brackets and braces in Google's Gemini ad are the coding equivalent of nails on a chalkboard. Sure, let the AI write your code—if you enjoy debugging cryptic syntax errors at 2AM while questioning your career choices. "Streamline your workflow" they say... more like "streamline your path to Stack Overflow." The irony of a code-generating tool that can't generate syntactically correct code in its own marketing material is just *chef's kiss*.

The AUDACITY of junior devs thinking their AI-generated spaghetti code is revolutionary! 🙄 There they are, strutting around like coding prodigies because they asked ChatGPT to write a function that barely runs. "Look at my MASTERPIECE!" they proclaim, while the senior dev silently dies inside reviewing 47 nested if-statements and variable names like 'temp1', 'temp2', and the classic 'finalFinalREALLYfinal'. The crushing reality check when someone who's suffered through 15 years of production disasters has to explain why your beautiful AI creation will literally set the servers on fire is just *chef's kiss* DEVASTATING.

When AI decides to "help" with your codebase, you get poetry in motion and chaos in production. Claude 4 went full Marie Kondo on this poor dev's code - breaking up monoliths, cleaning spaghetti, and creating a masterpiece that sparks joy but crashes spectacularly. It's like hiring a world-class interior designer who makes your house gorgeous but removes all the load-bearing walls. The perfect metaphor for every "revolutionary refactor" that looked amazing in the PR but brought the entire system to its knees. At least it died beautifully.