Bricked Code? Let's Add More!

Ah, the ultimate job security plan! Turns out the one person AI won't replace is the colleague who contributes absolutely nothing. That sweet spot where you're so useless that even automation can't justify the ROI of replacing you. It's like finding a bug so bizarre that QA just labels it as "expected behavior" and moves on. The perfect defense against technological unemployment isn't upskilling—it's strategic incompetence!

Ah yes, the newly emerging career field of "Vibe Coding Cleanup Specialist" – for when AI generates code that works but gives off bad energy. Soon we'll have job listings for "Legacy Comment Therapists" and "Whitespace Feng Shui Consultants." The real question is whether these specialists charge by the hour or by the number of "good vibes" successfully restored.

Remember when we used to explain our bugs to rubber ducks? Now we just bark orders at AI models to fix our spaghetti code. The evolution from "here's what I've tried" to "just fix it" perfectly captures our descent into tech laziness. Soon we'll just grunt and expect the AI to read our minds. Progress, I guess? At least the duck never judged our variable naming conventions.

The irony is thicker than legacy code documentation. OpenAI, with its cute little whale logo, has become increasingly closed-source while still parading around with "Open" in its name. It's like naming your password database "Totally_Not_Passwords.txt" and expecting nobody to notice. The "ClosedAI" rebrand is just calling a spade a spade – or in this case, calling proprietary code exactly what it is. Next up: Microsoft renames to "We_Definitely_Need_More_RAM_Inc."

The ultimate startup pivot: change one word and suddenly you're worth 10x more to VCs. Remember when we just admitted things were loading? Now our apps are having existential crises while fetching your cat photos. Next week: "contemplating the nature of existence..." while the database query times out. Venture capital flowing in 3...2...1...

The perfect visualization of AI conversations between a data scientist and a manager. Left guy: "Here's our multilayer perceptron neural network with input, hidden, and output layers." Manager: "What's it do?" Data scientist: "It outputs a 4." Manager: "That's it? That's dumb as hell." Meanwhile, the beautiful 3D function surface plot that actually represents complex mathematical transformations sits there being completely unappreciated. It's the classic "I spent 3 weeks optimizing this model and all my boss cares about is if it makes the line go up."