Regrettable Historic Error

Ah, the classic "C/C++ is dead" narrative that's been circulating since approximately the Jurassic period. This meme perfectly captures the eternal resilience of C/C++ despite countless obituaries written by trendy language evangelists. Every few years, some shiny new language comes along promising to be the "C++ killer" - yet there's C/C++, smugly posing next to its own grave, refusing to die. Meanwhile, critical infrastructure, operating systems, game engines, and performance-critical applications are still running on these supposedly "ancient" languages. The smirk says it all: "Nice try, Rust/Go/whatever... I've been declared dead more times than a soap opera villain, and I'm still powering the world while you're trying to figure out your package manager."

The intimidating gorilla staring into your soul represents the crushing reality that faces every programmer - no matter how advanced you become, how many frameworks you master, or how many years you spend in the industry, you'll still find yourself Googling the syntax for "Hello World" in whatever language you're using. It's that humbling moment when you've architected complex systems but still can't remember if it's print() , console.log() , System.out.println() , or fmt.Println() . The primal rage in those gorilla eyes is just your inner impostor syndrome wondering how you still have a job.

The bell curve of programming wisdom strikes again! The average devs (34% on each side) are busy crying about "proper" type usage, screaming that you absolutely MUST use unsigned integers for positive values. Meanwhile, both the beginners (left) and the enlightened masters (right) just use regular integers for everything and get on with their lives. Why waste precious brain cycles on unsigned vs signed when you could be solving actual problems? Type purists will spend 3 hours arguing about uint8 vs int8 while the rest of us shipped the feature and went home early. The circle of programming life is complete when you realize simplicity beats pedantry every time.

Ah, the classic programmer identity crisis. Someone asked for the most useful programming languages for 2025 and got Swift, C++, Go, and JavaScript mixed in with French, Japanese, Arabic, and German. Guess the algorithm can't tell the difference between talking to computers and talking to humans. Probably trained on Stack Overflow comments where both are equally incomprehensible. At least they didn't recommend COBOL - that would've been a real sign of AI hallucination.

The kid asks for a io.EOF , mom says they have io.EOF at home. But at home? Just a goto statement lying on the bed. Classic Golang error handling bait and switch. The real crime here isn't the error handling—it's that someone's teaching their kid to use goto instead of proper error patterns. That's how you raise a future legacy code maintainer.

Oh. My. GOD. The AUDACITY of Go's standard CLI library using a single dash for long options! I'm literally SHAKING right now. While every civilized language on this forsaken planet uses double dashes like "--option", Go just HAD to be different with its "-option" format. The TRAUMA of typing the wrong number of dashes and watching your program implode is just TOO MUCH to bear! This is why relationships with programming languages end, people! It's not me, Go, IT'S YOU and your dash-related commitment issues! 💅