We Should Probably Have Another Meeting

The productivity multiplier we never asked for! Two engineers casually "vibe coding" together can now generate enough technical debt to keep an entire engineering department busy for months. It's that magical moment when someone says "let's just ship it and fix it later" and suddenly your codebase has more workarounds than actual features. The best part? Those two engineers have probably moved on to a new project by the time anyone discovers their architectural masterpiece of duct tape and prayers. Efficiency at its finest!

That moment when the entire dev team is discussing some trendy new paradigm and you've been nodding along for 45 minutes straight. Vibe coding isn't real—it's just what happens when you're six meetings deep and everyone's using buzzwords that weren't in the documentation yesterday. The real programming technique is looking confident while frantically Googling under the table.

The classic career progression paradox. You spend years honing your coding skills, finally reach senior status, and your reward? Calendar full of meetings where you defend the team from management while explaining why features aren't shipping faster. Meanwhile, juniors actually get to code—albeit mostly fixing their own bugs. The ultimate developer career irony: get promoted, stop coding. Congratulations on your fancy title and your new life as a professional meeting attendee.

That face when the product owner describes a completely vague feature, you have zero clue how to implement it, but somehow everyone agrees it's a "5-point story." In Agile planning poker, story points are supposed to measure complexity, but they've become the universal "sounds complicated but not too complicated" metric. It's the software equivalent of answering "fine" when someone asks how you're doing while your code is silently burning in production. The best part? Next sprint, that innocent 5-pointer will mutate into a 13-point monster with seven undocumented dependencies and a legacy system integration nobody mentioned in the planning meeting.

The fossilized remains of a developer who DARED to ask for a code review! ☠️ Honey, some say he submitted his PR during sprint planning and turned into LITERAL DUST while refreshing GitHub notifications. The archaeological evidence suggests he waited through THREE COMPANY RESTRUCTURES and a complete rewrite of the codebase before finally perishing. His last words were reportedly "just a quick review plz" sent via Slack at 4:59pm on a Friday. Tragic, yet completely avoidable if literally ANYONE on his team had bothered to look at his branch. Pour one out for our fallen comrade! 💀

The eternal corporate blame game in its natural habitat. Nobody actually knows how the feature works because the documentation disappeared into the same void where missing socks and project timelines go. QA points to Product, Product points to Engineering, and Engineering points right back because that's how we roll in software development. Meanwhile, the customer is sitting there wondering why they pay for this circus. The real documentation was the friends we made along the way.