Me When I Boot My $9,000 Windows 11 Gaming PC After Shutting It Down Over 8 Hours Ago

Someone standing proudly in front of a Windows Vista launch banner that reads "The 'Wow' starts now." The title references Apple's new Liquid Glass while essentially saying "I've seen operating systems make empty promises before." Vista promised revolutionary experiences but delivered driver incompatibilities and BSODs instead. Veterans of the OS wars carry these scars like badges of honor. Young devs excited about Apple's new tech have no idea what disappointment feels like.

So you've got a beast of a machine with an RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, NVMe SSDs, and 32GB of RAM, but Windows is somehow using 21.2GB of memory just sitting idle. Zero CPU usage, zero disk activity, and your Wi-Fi is crawling at 136 Kbps like it's 2003. Classic Windows moment right there. The real kicker? That's 66% memory usage with literally nothing running. Between all those background telemetry services, Windows Defender scanning your soul, and the seventeen Microsoft Edge processes you never opened, your RAM is basically running a full-time job while you're just trying to open Task Manager to see what's going on. That "/s" in the title is doing some heavy lifting here – because if this is "optimized," I'd hate to see what unoptimized looks like. Probably would require downloading more RAM.

Modern RGB gaming rigs with their NVMe SSDs and 64GB RAM boot faster than you can blink, and they have the audacity to apologize for taking 3 seconds. Meanwhile, that beige tower from 2003 needed a solid 10 minutes just to POST, let alone load Windows XP. You'd literally hit the power button, go make coffee, check your email on your phone, come back, and it'd still be whirring away like a jet engine trying to load the desktop icons one by one. The real kicker? That ancient machine would take 5 minutes just to get to the point where you could click on Need For Speed: Underground. Then another 5 for the game to actually load. Kids these days complaining about 2-second load screens have no idea about the character-building experience of waiting for a single application to launch while listening to your hard drive sound like it's grinding gravel.

You know you've been in tech too long when you casually drop "FreeBSD" in conversation and expect normal humans to nod knowingly. We live in a bubble where everyone can recite the Linux kernel version but forgets that Aunt Susan thinks "the cloud" is actual weather. The painful truth: most people's OS knowledge stops at "the one with the apple" and "the one that needs updates every five minutes." Meanwhile, we're out here assuming everyone's at least dabbled in Arch btw. The cognitive dissonance is real when you realize that mentioning BSD gets you blank stares instead of the heated Unix philosophy debate you were hoping for. Pro tip from someone who's made this mistake at too many family dinners: if they don't know what a distro is, they definitely don't need to hear about your Gentoo compile times.

Content foone Foone - 15 Std. So I learned of an amusing bug today. Docker for Windows won't run if you have the Razer Synapse driver management tool running. But the reason is the funny part... 142 17 5.638 ( 11.143 foone Foone 15 Std. So, both programs want to ensure you only run one copy of themselves. So they create a global mutex using the GUID of their NET assembly, right? t7 36 834 foone Foone 15 Std. except! they do it wrong. And they both do it wrong in the same way. The code involved is something like this: string.Format(Global(01, (object) Assembly.GetExecuting Assembly.GetType0.GUID); 11 17 44 ( 888 foone Foone 15 Std. The idea is to get the GUID of the assembly that's executing and to create a GUID based on that, so now you can only run one copy of it. 0 2 17 20 ( 650 foone Foone 15 Std. But it's wrong. The .GetType0 part isn't supposed to be there. That gets the type of the assembly, not the assembly itself. And that type is System.Reflection.RuntimeAssembly, part of .NET itself. 0 2 17 29 ( 1.005 1 foone Foone 15 Std. So what happens is that both of them are creating a global mutex to ensure only one copy runs, but instead of basing the GUID on their own code, they're both using the GUID of a part of NET itself. And they're using the same one! 4 17 45 ( 1.168 foone Foone 15 Std. So how'd that happen? Well, it turns out we can tell EXACTLY how that happened. Because the answer is... STACK OVERFLOW 16 17 301 3.003 foone Foone 15 Std. Back in 2009, the user "Nathan" asked how to get the GUID of the running accommin Twitter durchsuchen foone Foone 15 Std. A year and a month later, it was pointed out (by "Yoopergeek") that it gives the wrong GUID. Three years later, Cerebrus returns and fixes the answer. They can't delete it, because it was accepted 0 7 17 30 C 1.252 foone Foone . 15 Std. V But because they made an error in replying to someone in 2009... this flawed code caused bugs that still exist as recently as March of 2018. Docker for Windows won't start if Razer Synapse 3 is ... Just a quick tip if you're struggling to get docker for Windows working on Windows 10. If you have Razer .. reddit.com 9 17 112 1.829 foone Foone That flawed stackoverflow post is here: How do I programmatically get the GUID of an application in ... I need to access the assembly of my project in C NET2.0. I can see the GUID in the 'Assembly Information' dialog in under stackoverflow.com 6:48 vorm. 18. Feb. 2020 Twitter Web App 39 Retweets 1.281 Gefllt mir"-Angaben

Windows file deletion is basically a soap opera. You ask to delete one simple file and suddenly Windows is like "OMG there's DRAMA! Someone's using this file right now!" But when you ask who's using it? Windows goes full witness protection program. "I've been sworn to secrecy!" Meanwhile, you're just sitting there wondering if your computer is hosting secret file parties behind your back. The best part? That file is probably just locked by Windows Explorer itself, which is basically like your roommate saying they can't tell you who ate your leftovers while they have sauce on their face.