The Name's Bond, Technical Debt Bond

The software development lifecycle as told by a stroller: First, we have the Feature - pristine, untouched, still in the showroom. Marketing's dream child with those sexy green wheels. Then comes Dev Testing - "Yeah, it works on my machine!" The developer casually strolls with it, confident everything's fine because they're walking on a smooth, predictable path. Next up: QA Testing - Sprinting through the mall, pushing it to its limits, trying to break that sucker before release. "But have you tried clicking the button 17 times while holding Shift?" Finally, the User - a crude stick figure flying off a skateboard while the stroller crashes separately. Because in production, users will find ways to break your code that you couldn't imagine in your wildest fever dreams. And that's why we can't have nice things in software.

Content My boss thanking me for fixing the bugs in production Me reverting my last commit

The ancient curse of the tech world strikes again! That poor soul made the cardinal sin of trying to "clean up" a working codebase in a single day. Every senior dev knows that legacy code is like an archaeological site - start digging without a proper plan and you'll unleash ancient curses that turn you into a mummified skeleton. That "quick refactoring" always starts with "I'll just fix this one messy function" and ends with your soul being sucked into dependency hell. The road to production is paved with the remains of developers who said "I can rewrite this over the weekend."

Ah, the classic "chandelier headlights" approach to programming. Nothing says "senior developer with deadlines" quite like ripping some random Stack Overflow solution and jamming it into your codebase with zero understanding of how it works. That car is basically every production system I've ever inherited. Sure, those fancy chandeliers aren't designed to be headlights, but hey—they're emitting light, aren't they? Ship it! The real magic happens three months later when you've forgotten you did this and have to debug why your car keeps blowing fuses and setting small birds on fire.

The AUDACITY of code to betray you like this! ✨YESTERDAY✨ your precious little program was running flawlessly, a beautiful symphony of logic and syntax. Then you wake up today, change ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, and suddenly your code decides to have a full-blown existential crisis throwing 17 errors?! The digital gods must be laughing at our suffering! It's like your code went out partying overnight and came back with a vengeful hangover. The most haunting programming mystery isn't complex algorithms—it's why code that worked perfectly yesterday suddenly decides to implode today without being touched. Trust issues? I have them with my IDE now.

Content D. Boris and His Amazing Haircut time limit per test: 2 seconds memory limit per test: 256 megabytes input: standard input output: standard output Boris thinks that chess is a tedious game. So he left his tournament early and went to a barber shop as his hair was a bit messy. His current hair can be described by an array a1, 2, . .., an, where a; is the height of the hair standing at position i. His desired haircut can be described by an array b1, b2, . . . , On, in a similar fashion. Front Side