Recursive Print: When AI Optimization Goes Nuclear

Content Scion Wein. r ciliar e crer,urnts index site u,0): Litt rETUrI his sconce t. length?or (n, t) Getn, F:t An,velt, 3)) )function Xe(n, t) fra a mu(n), functio nce(n, 16, F ,F Xu("'Expected a function" F.F "Jir u.placeholdearerion n.placeholde rush-function e)if(typeot 'function") cion switch(t. length) case 0; return return null nia" function" return in. call(th torn) (return gu(n)ssal uncise Function"-ani"lobjec hecion vu(n) (var tetypeor naretwe (object'object12t (n))56 (nvi (n), null Stapo (n) nigt (mu(n). (" (object Map!" t?L: " (object Set's-t?D: Bu) (n))function wurs .4204967295) :0) function ku(n)(Li(typeor n "number") recur ni wtiljn. test (n)2Fn(n.slice (2), t22:8) : yn. test (n) ?P; Sim (return au (n) 7Gn (n) : Ht (n) unction 2u(n) Cit(au(0220. nfunction Gn(n, true) miss Mean? () tur (n.Rt(n,zu. ho).

Content 4411 Locked. There are disputes about this answer's content being resolved at this time. It is not currently accepting new interactions. V You can't parse XHTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Rege queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The center cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regx-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the transgression of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of 8rrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radianc destroying all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking from your eyes like liquid pain, the song of rgular expression parsing-will extinquish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see. if it is beautiful the final snuffing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pony he comes he comes he comes the ichor permeates all MY FACE MY FACE h god no NO NOOOO NO stop the an"des are not reaT zALGO IS TONY THE PONY HE COMES Have you tried using an XML parser instead? Moderator's Note This post is locked to prevent inappropriate edits to its content. The post looks exactly as it is supposed to look - there are no problems with its content. Please do not flag it for our attention. ProdrammerH

Content STOP USING PYTHON PROGRAMMING WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE FOR CHILDREN YEARS OF PROGRAMMING yet PYTHON has NEVER BEEN USED for ANY REAL WORLD APPLICATION PYTHON is a language for BABIES. NO ADULT that has A FUNCTIONING BRAIN would use a language THAT STEALS LIBRARIES THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE MADE b-BuT iSn'T iT iNtUiTiVe ThOuGh??? SHUT THE FUCK UP. Python FORCES the user to learn HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of commands, and they are ALL COMPLETE HORSESHIT myAge input () Why does it want your PERSONAL INFORMATION? while b 10 TEN WHAT? APPLES? ORANGES? print( 'Hello world!') WHAT IF YOU DON'T HAVE A PRINTER? There ALREADY EXISTS a language that only makes you learn EIGHT commands, IT'S CALLED BRAINFUCK ProarammerHumor.io

Content WHEN YOU APPROVE SOMEONE ELSE'S CODE REVIEW THAT ENDS UP BREAKING THE PIPELINE AFTER GETTING MERGED IN. (chuckles) I'm in danger.

Joe just committed the cardinal sin of programming discussions—questioning naming conventions that make absolutely no sense. Despite JavaScript having nothing to do with Java, nobody bats an eye, but suggest "PythonScript" and suddenly you're being vaporized by government agencies. The programming world runs on arbitrary traditions that we all silently agree never to question. One day you're wondering why CSS isn't called "HTMLStyle," the next you're being monitored by men in black suits because you've seen too much.

Ah, the classic variable naming progression of a developer slowly losing their mind! Started with a reasonable user , then users for a collection, and then... complete descent into nested list madness. By the time we hit userssssssss with 8 levels of nesting, we're basically writing code that future-you will need therapy to debug. The number of brackets at the end is practically a bracket avalanche waiting to crash your syntax highlighter. This is what happens when you code at 1% battery with no variable naming convention document in sight.