The Great Data Pronunciation Divide

Content A human cell has 75MB of DNA information, a sperm cell has half of it 37.5MB, a milliliter of semen has 100 million sperm cells; on average, a ejaculation lasts 5 seconds and has 2.24 milliliters of semen That means a man is able to produce: (37.5MB x 100.000.000 x 2.255 1.687.500.000.000.000 bytessec 1,6875 Terabytessec; That means a ovule is able to recive a dDOS attack of 1,6 terabytes per second and only lets one package pass, making it THE BEST FIREWALL IN THE WORLD

The filesystem rebellion we never asked for! Unicode and special characters in filenames are the chaotic evil of computing. Remember those ancient days when filenames had to be 8.3 format and couldn't have spaces? Fast forward to now where someone's saving files as $6.14 receipt for bagel @ Bagel Bitc# 😋.pdf.jpg and filesystem engineers are quietly sobbing in the corner. The best part is that "CAPITAL I LOWERCASE L NUMBER 1" joke - because nothing says "I want to watch the world burn" like creating filenames specifically designed to be visually indistinguishable from each other. It's like the digital equivalent of replacing someone's sugar with salt. And that absurdly specific filepath to Abbey Road? Pure psychological warfare against sysadmins everywhere.

Content This product contains peanuts.

Ah, the classic "nine women can't make a baby in one month" software development metaphor just got a brutal upgrade. What starts as a lesson about how some tasks can't be parallelized quickly descends into the actual nightmare of project management reality : • Half your "resources" aren't even qualified for the job • Your deadline was a fantasy from the start • The client doesn't actually need what they asked for, but instead wants something completely different that the PM thought would be "easier" It's not just Brooks' Law anymore—it's corporate absurdity distilled into three bullet points of pure developer trauma.

Ah yes, the anti-programming manifesto from someone who clearly had their code compile on the first try and couldn't handle the success. The author seems to believe computers should just magically do math without being told how. Next they'll expect their car to drive without a steering wheel because "wheels are circles, not driving devices." My favorite part is complaining about recursive methods with threads while typing this rant on a device powered by... wait for it... programming. That's like yelling at clouds for raining while standing under an umbrella. And that final while(true){ print(money); } snippet? If only it were that easy. I've been running that code for years and my bank account remains stubbornly unimpressed.

Remember when we actually had to write efficient code? Now we just throw more RAM at the problem and call it a day. The meme perfectly captures how game development evolved from "let's squeeze every bit of performance from this hardware" to "eh, just buy a better graphics card." Why optimize your code when you can make your users optimize their bank accounts instead?