Or Just Use ChatGPT And Know Nothing

The transatlantic compensation gap hits different. American devs swimming in six-figure salaries, stock options, and enough perks to make a small nation jealous - represented by Homer as a bejeweled monarch. Meanwhile, European developers are eating ramen in their underwear, wondering if they should've just become baristas instead. The salary difference is so astronomical it's practically a different currency system - one measured in "yachts per quarter" versus "can I afford name-brand cereal this month?"

Content function ProarammerHumor. to function

Content STOP DOING MULTITHREADING PROGRAMMING WAS NOT MEANT TO BE SIMULTANEOUS YEARS OF CODING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for doing things OUT OF ORDER Wanted to wait before doing something? We had a tool for that: It was called "DOING IT LATER" "Yes please give me await of something. Please give me Promise of it" - Statements dreamed up by evil wizards LOOK at what AAA game devs have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the DEVTOOLS IDES we built for them (This is REAL code, done by REAL programmers if keepGoing: func playCutscene (cutlame : Stri rundialog(cut else: yield value; value 1; playcut sceneAsync (cutName) ; await runDial func playcutsceneAsync (cutName ????? ??????? ????????????????? "Hello I would like LATER apples please" imghip.com They have played us for absolute fools

Content LINUX : BORN TO BE ROOT WINDOWS : BORN TO RE-BOOT

The eternal paradox of Emacs: a text editor so powerful it requires you to grow a beard while learning it. The joke is brilliant because it's painfully true - Emacs has such a steep learning curve that the longer you procrastinate starting, the more of your remaining lifespan it'll consume. It's like telling someone "this workout takes 10 years, so you better start at age 5." Meanwhile, Vim users are smugly nodding while pretending their editor doesn't have the same problem.

Ah, the ancient scrolls of IBM wisdom. Back when computers were the size of rooms and management actually understood their limitations. Fast forward to 2023: "Let's have the AI make all our business decisions!" Meanwhile, when something breaks, it's still the human's fault. Funny how we've gone from "computers shouldn't make decisions" to "the algorithm said we should fire 30% of staff, so..." I'm sure this sign is framed right next to the "THINK" posters in IBM's museum of ignored advice.