Tech debt Memes

I'm Going To Fail That Class

2 days ago 199.9K views 0 shares

When your software architecture professor asks about your design patterns and you realize your entire codebase is held together by duct tape, prayer, and a single try-catch block that catches Exception. Sure, you've got architecture—disaster architecture. The kind where every component is tightly coupled, your database talks directly to your UI, and your "separation of concerns" is just different folders with the same spaghetti code. But hey, at least you're self-aware about the impending doom, which is more than most CS students can say when they're confidently explaining their monolithic mess as "microservices-ready."

Lord Help Me

Programming Csharp Java Backend

4 days ago 110.0K views 0 shares

Oh no. Your manager just discovered the Gang of Four book and now thinks they're an architect. What was once a simple 50-line feature is now being meticulously refactored into seventeen different classes, each with its own AbstractFactoryBuilderStrategyObserverDecoratorProxy. Every function call now requires navigating through six layers of indirection because "it's more maintainable this way." The codebase has transformed from a cozy cottage into a sprawling industrial complex where finding anything requires a map, a compass, and possibly divine intervention. Sure, it's "enterprise-ready" now, but you need a PhD just to add a button. The real kicker? Half these patterns are solving problems you don't even have yet. Welcome to over-engineering paradise, population: your entire dev team, all working overtime to understand what used to be obvious.

The 2 AM Cure

Debugging Programming Testing Frontend Backend

6 days ago 164.4K views 0 shares

You spent 6 hours debugging why the feature only works for you. Then at 2 AM, your brain finally fires that one remaining neuron and whispers: "just gate it behind admin access, bro." Nothing says "production-ready code" quite like slapping if (isAdmin || isBetaUser) on a broken feature and calling it "controlled rollout." Tomorrow's standup just got a whole lot easier when you can confidently say it's "working as intended" for select users. The double ampersand at the end? That's your sleep-deprived brain trying to add another condition before realizing it has no idea what that condition should be. Ship it anyway. What could go wrong?

Code Reusability

Programming Debugging Backend

8 days ago 289.8K views 1 shares

Oh honey, someone out there really took "Don't Repeat Yourself" to a whole new level of chaos. We've got ONE light switch pulling double duty controlling BOTH the lights AND the elevator because apparently separating concerns is for people with actual budgets. Some architect somewhere was like "why waste money on two switches when we can create a beautiful nightmare?" Now you've got people trapped in darkness every time someone needs to go up a floor. It's giving "tightly coupled code" energy but in REAL LIFE. The building management really said "let's make everything depend on everything else" and called it efficiency. Somewhere, a software engineer is having flashbacks to that one function that does seventeen unrelated things because the original dev thought they were being clever.

Viber Coders When Someone Asks How Does This Code Work

Programming Debugging Backend

12 days ago 145.3K views 0 shares

Viber Coders When Someone Asks How Does This Code Work

You know that look when someone asks you to explain code you wrote six months ago? Now imagine that, but the code was written by someone who left the company three years ago, has zero documentation, and somehow still runs in production. That's Viber engineering in a nutshell. The monkey puppet meme captures that exact moment of existential dread when you realize you have no idea how any of it works, but you're too deep in to admit it. The code just... exists. It functions. Nobody touches it. Nobody questions it. It's like that load-bearing comment in the codebase—remove it and everything collapses. Props to whoever maintains Viber though. Legacy messaging apps are basically digital archaeology at this point. Every commit is like defusing a bomb while wearing oven mitts.

Un-Natural Disasters

Devops Agile Programming Backend Cloud

16 days ago 259.9K views 0 shares

The corporate response cycle in its purest form. Server room floods, everyone panics, forms a committee to discuss root causes, writes up a beautiful "lessons learned" document with all the right buzzwords, then promptly ignores the actual fix because... well, committees don't fix roofs, do they? Notice how "Fix roof?" is crossed out at the bottom of that email. That's not a bug, that's a feature of enterprise culture. Why solve the actual problem when you can have endless retrospectives about it instead? By the time they schedule "Server Room Flood Retrospective #4," the poor guy is literally standing in water again. The real disaster isn't the flood—it's the organizational paralysis that treats symptoms while the bucket keeps overflowing. At least the documentation is getting better though, right?

I Am Not Ready For This!!

Programming Databases Backend

20 days ago 324.3K views 0 shares

When you're fresh out of bootcamp learning React and TypeScript, then someone casually mentions COBOL and you're like "what's that?" only to watch senior devs collectively lose their minds. For context: COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language) was created in 1959 and is still running critical banking systems, insurance companies, and government infrastructure worldwide. We're talking billions of transactions daily on code older than your parents. The problem? Nobody wants to learn it, everyone who knows it is retiring, and banks are desperately clinging to these systems because rewriting them would be like performing open-heart surgery on a patient running a marathon. New programmers see it as ancient history that should be extinct. Banks see it as the immovable foundation of global finance that cannot be destroyed without triggering financial apocalypse. The cognitive dissonance is *chef's kiss*. Fun fact: There are an estimated 220 billion lines of COBOL still in production today. That's roughly 43% of all banking systems. Sleep tight! 💀

Hate When This Happen

Programming Webdev Javascript

22 days ago 334.7K views 0 shares

Nothing quite like having a principal dev who's been maintaining that legacy COBOL system since the Reagan administration get schooled by the 23-year-old who just finished a React bootcamp. The confidence of fresh grads who think their 6 months of JavaScript experience qualifies them to refactor a battle-tested system that's been running production for 15 years is truly something to behold. Meanwhile, the senior dev is standing there thinking about all the edge cases, technical debt, and production incidents that aren't covered in the latest Medium article the junior just read. But sure, let's rewrite everything in the framework-of-the-month because "it's how it's done now."

That Is What Every Developer's Story

Programming Devops Agile

24 days ago 148.5K views 4 shares

When your manager asks for "whatever you managed to finish," you know they've already accepted defeat. The bar is so low it's practically underground. The guy coding on a literal office chair strapped to a rickety cart in the middle of traffic is basically every developer trying to ship features with zero resources, impossible deadlines, and a tech stack held together by duct tape and prayer. The infrastructure is falling apart, there's no proper setup, but hey—at least you're moving forward, right? Peak project management: lowering expectations so much that simply surviving the sprint counts as a win. Ship it and pray the production servers don't catch fire. 🔥

Throw It For The 2026

Debugging Csharp Javascript Programming Python

28 days ago 294.6K views 0 shares

Someone asked for the worst tech advice and honestly, this is peak developer wisdom right here. Just wrap everything in a try-catch block and throw it into the void. Error handling? Never heard of her. Stack traces? Who needs 'em when you can just silently fail and pretend nothing happened. This is basically the programming equivalent of sweeping dirt under the rug and calling it cleaning. Your app crashes? Try-catch. Database connection fails? Try-catch. Existential crisis at 2 AM? Believe it or not, also try-catch. The catch block stays empty though—because acknowledging problems is for people who have time for proper error handling. Production bugs will love you for this approach. Future you will definitely not be cursing past you while debugging why the application just... stops working with zero logs or error messages. Ship it!

Choose Your Tech Debt

Programming Debugging

1 month ago 376.8K views 1 shares

Ah yes, the eternal fork in the road of software development. On the left, we have the noble path of refactoring that spaghetti mess you inherited from your past self (or worse, your predecessor). Sunshine, rainbows, clean architecture—basically a fantasy land that requires actual effort and time you definitely don't have. On the right? The dark, stormy path of "if it works, don't touch it." That haunted mansion of legacy code where you're pretty sure there's a function that's been running since 2009 and nobody knows why, but production hasn't exploded yet, so... 🤷 The developer stands at the crossroads, knowing full well they're about to take the right path because deadlines exist and management doesn't care about your SOLID principles. The real kicker? Both paths lead to tech debt anyway. One just gets you there faster while letting you sleep at night (barely). Future you will hate present you either way. Choose wisely... or don't. The code will judge you regardless.

Dr Blame The Dev

Rust Golang C++ Typescript Javascript

1 month ago 449.9K views 0 shares

Someone wrote a manifesto about how using C, C++, Python, or vanilla JavaScript in production is basically corporate negligence, advocating for Rust, Go, and TypeScript instead. The reply? "Nonsense. If your code has reached the point of unmaintainable complexity, then blame the author, not the language." Classic developer blame game. The first person is basically saying "your tools are bad and you should feel bad," while the second person fires back with "skill issue, not language issue." Both are technically correct, which makes this argument eternal. The reality? Yeah, modern languages with better type systems and memory safety do prevent entire classes of bugs. But also yeah, a terrible developer can write unmaintainable garbage in any language, including Rust. You can't memory-safety your way out of 10,000-line functions and zero documentation. The real takeaway: if you're shipping production code in 2025 without considering memory safety and type guarantees, you're making a choice. Just make sure it's an informed one, not a "we've always done it this way" one.

Browse