Seems Fine To Me

Content W a. 3 years ago HTML: Works even if you don't follow the rules. rules. with. CSS: Doesn't work, even if you follow the JavaScript: Doesn't tell you the rules to begin 1K E 26

Ah, the classic DoorDash time paradox where your delivery driver is simultaneously waiting for your food at 1:58 AM and 1:03 AM. Apparently, their backend devs skipped the "How Time Works 101" class in college. This is what happens when you let the same people who think "it works on my machine" is a valid deployment strategy handle temporal logic. Somewhere, a senior developer is sighing while explaining that time typically flows in one direction, unless you're using JavaScript's Date object, in which case all bets are off.

Classic corporate theater right here. Boss is out there taking victory laps for "avoiding" a critical exploit while the dev team hasn't run npm update since the Stone Age. You didn't dodge the vulnerability—you just haven't been pwned yet . There's a difference between being secure and just being lucky nobody's bothered to scan your infrastructure. Every security team knows this feeling: management celebrating "proactive security measures" while your package.json is basically a CVE museum. That Axios exploit? Sure, you're not vulnerable... because you're still running a version from 2019 that has 47 OTHER vulnerabilities. It's like bragging about not getting COVID while living in a house made of asbestos.

THE AUDACITY of clients to praise you for delivering on time when your code is literally held together with duct tape and prayers! 💀 That awkward handshake moment when they're all "thank you for your professionalism" while you're internally SCREAMING because 30% of your buttons are just sitting there, utterly useless, dumping their sad little lives into the console.log void. But hey, the client doesn't need to know that half your code is just digital confetti waiting to explode at the slightest provocation! Ship it and pray no one clicks the wrong thing!

Content Sign Up If your baby is born in 2023 20235: Starts Kindergarten 202318: Graduates Highschool 202321: Legal Drinking Age 202340: Turns 40 202362: Retirement

Someone really looked at Rock Paper Scissors and thought "yeah, I can solve this with string concatenation." The genius move here is adding the computer's choice (1, 2, or 3) to the player's choice (also 1, 2, or 3) and checking if the result equals specific strings like "11", "22", "33" for draws, or "12" for rock vs paper. The problem? They're concatenating numbers as strings instead of doing actual math. So when computer picks 1 and player picks 2, you get "12" (the string), not 3 (the number). It's technically functional but hilariously cursed. It's like using a sledgehammer to crack an egg - sure it works, but everyone watching is uncomfortable. The real kicker is they're treating what should be simple arithmetic logic (winner = (player - computer + 3) % 3) like some kind of bizarre string matching puzzle. Props for creativity, but my code reviewer would have questions.