Have You Tried Licking It?

Content 4414 8 Locked. There are disputes about this answer's content being resolved at this time. It is not currently accepting new interactions. You can't parse XHTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The center cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex a a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of corrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent stithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radiance destroving all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking from your eyeslike liquid pain, the song of regular expression parsing- will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see it it is beautiful the final snuffing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pony he comes he comes he comes the ichor; permeates all MY FACE MY FACE higed no NO NOOOO NO stop the an ales ZALGO IS TONY THE FNY, HE ICON Have you tried using an XML parser instead? Moderator's Note This post is locked to prevent inappropriate edits to its content. The post looks exactly as it is supposed to look - there are no problems with its content. Please do not flag it for our attention. share edit follow flag edited Jun 20 at 9:12 community wiki 7 revs, 5 users 36 bobince

Excited about contributing to open source until discovering it's written in JavaScript? Classic developer mood swing! From "I'm gonna change the world" to "nevermind, I'd rather slam my keyboard against the wall" in 0.2 seconds. JavaScript went from being that quirky browser toy to somehow taking over the entire development ecosystem. Now we're all stuck with package.json files larger than our actual code and 47,000 dependencies just to center a div. The enthusiasm drain is real - nothing kills your coding passion quite like realizing you'll need to understand someone else's JS spaghetti code with 15 different design patterns and zero comments.

Content e4moji e4moii If I had a nickel for every time I got confused, I'd be like "where'd this nickel come from?" and then there'd be another nickel and I'd think "what's with the nickels?" leading to more nickels and confusion and eventually I'd be slowly crushed by nickels without ever knowing why ProarammerHumor.io

The garbage collector doesn't discriminate—whether your code is written by someone who names variables "x1" and "x2" or a developer who thinks they're writing poetry with their function names, it all gets cleaned up the same way. Memory leaks don't care about your vibes. This hits different because "vibe coders" are out here writing code based on aesthetics and feelings, probably spending 20 minutes deciding between map vs forEach based on which one "feels right." Meanwhile, the garbage collector is just doing its job, treating their beautifully crafted objects the same as any other unreferenced heap allocation. No bonus points for code that sparks joy. At the end of the day, once that reference count hits zero or the mark-and-sweep algorithm runs, your elegant singleton pattern and someone's nested ternary nightmare get the same treatment: straight to the memory dump.

Content sottom antification increment (Smut arrarr. len() - 1); compiles Rust Yup. let range 2..arr. len() - 1; increment slice(Smut arr range); also compiles Rust Yup. Theno incrementslice(mut arr2..arr.len() - 1); should also compile Rust Makes sense to mutable borrow occurs here mutable borrow later used here me. error E0502: cannot borrow - sremain.rs:19:33 Then compile it. Prodrammerumor.io

Content I MADE A BOOKIIT'G OUT ON MAY 13 A CHILDREN'S BOOK THAT'S ALSO FOR GROWN UPS: MY NAME 15 404. PRE-ORDER IT ON AMAZON! QUAX NET SPAGHETTI CODE TANGLED, INTERTWINED, MESSY. CHANGING SOMETHING ON ONE SIDE WILL BREAK SOMETHING THE THER. TRYING TO TAME THIS BE AST WILL LEAVE LOT OF PEOPLE COLORED RED LASAGNA CODE LAYERS. LAYERS, AND THEN SOME MORE LAYERS. OH, YOU WANT TO ACCESS SOME PROPERTY FROM CLASS X? SORRY, NO CAN 2; AND BAFE TO ACCESS IF MAYBE YOU CAN GO THROUGH CLASSES OR MAYBE IT'S EASIER TO DO AN API CALL TO YOUR OWN SERVICE JUST SO OU HAVE ALL THE DATA YOU NEED RAVIOLI CODE WAY TOO MANY MODULESNODESCLASSES. AND THEYRE ALL TIN. WHaT DOES THIS DO? BUT THEN WHaT'S THaT? WHY IS THIS SPLIT UP IN FIVE CLASSES? DO WE REALLY NEED A MODULE FOR SIMPLE IS-ODD CHECK DON'T PUT EVERY 7 FUCKING LINES IN ITS OWN CLASS, DAVE. GNOCCHI CODE UNREADABLE BLOBS OF CODE. YOU CAN TELL THERE'S A LOT GOING ON INSIDE, BUT YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT. CHANGING THESE DENSE CHUNKS OF UNREADABILITY AFTER THE FACT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE. IT'LL BREAK APART FOR SURE. SPAGHETTI CODE IN THE CLOUD THIS IS YOUR FUTURE. EMBRACE YOUR NEW OVERLORD. COEDITS tO MOD ProarammerHumor.io CONSOLIA-COMIC.COM