Cursed code Memes

Quick N Dirty Fix For Your Spaghetti

1 day ago 246.2K views 0 shares

So you've got some spaghetti code that's been held together with duct tape and prayers, and Claude is sitting there contemplating the nuclear option: wiping the user's entire filesystem. Because why debug your mess when you can just eliminate all evidence of its existence, right? That Larry David "ehh, maybe?" expression is doing some heavy lifting here. It's that exact moment when your AI assistant realizes your codebase is so cursed that the most ethical solution might actually be scorched earth. The fact that it's genuinely considering whether filesystem annihilation is a reasonable debugging strategy tells you everything about the quality of code it's dealing with. Pro tip: if your AI coding assistant starts suggesting rm -rf as a "fix," it might be time to refactor. Or switch careers. Probably both.

The Great Gen Z

Microsoft Windows Programming Python

7 days ago 220.0K views 0 shares

Gen Z developers out here really using Microsoft Word as their IDE because their parents coded while sipping wine during pregnancy. The causation is crystal clear: alcohol during pregnancy → 20 years later → unironically thinking Word is a legitimate development environment. The video title "Why Microsoft Word is the best IDE for programming" is either the most elaborate troll in tech history or proof that we've failed as a species. Either way, 465K people watched it, which means humanity's curiosity about terrible ideas remains our most consistent trait. At least they're importing libraries properly... in a word processor. Baby steps, I guess?

20 Years Later

Microsoft Windows Programming

7 days ago 183.0K views 0 shares

You know how pregnant people are told "don't drink, don't smoke, it won't affect the baby"? Well, turns out some things DO have long-term consequences. Fast forward 20 years and the baby grows up to be someone who genuinely believes Microsoft Word is the best IDE for programming. The video shows someone actually coding in Word with syntax highlighting and everything, making a case for why it's a "superior" development environment. It's like watching someone use a hammer to screw in a lightbulb and then writing a thesis on why it's more efficient than a ladder. The causality here is chef's kiss: something clearly went wrong during development (pun intended), and now we're witnessing the consequences. Next up: "Why Notepad is better than Git for version control" and "Excel: The Ultimate Database Management System."

Infra As React

AWS Devops React Javascript Frontend

8 days ago 201.2K views 3 shares

Someone really woke up and said "You know what DevOps needs? More JSX." Because apparently writing infrastructure as code in YAML or HCL wasn't hipster enough, so now we're defining VPCs, RDS instances, and Lambda functions with React components and className props. Nothing screams "production-ready" quite like treating your AWS infrastructure like it's a frontend component library. Next thing you know, someone's gonna useState() to manage their Kubernetes cluster state and useEffect() to provision EC2 instances. The fact that it generates actual Terraform files is both impressive and deeply concerning – like watching someone build a house with a spoon and somehow succeeding.

What Do I Need The Include Lines For

C++ Programming Debugging

8 days ago 259.6K views 0 shares

Someone just discovered the secret to writing memory-safe C code: free your memory before you allocate it. Galaxy brain move right there. The cherry on top? They included assert.h like they're about to write production-quality code with proper error handling, but then immediately went full chaos mode with free(&malloc()) . That's like putting on a seatbelt before driving off a cliff. Pro tip: Those include statements are actually the only correct part of this code. Everything after line 5 is a war crime against computing.

Operator Overloading Is Fun

C++ Programming Java

8 days ago 244.7K views 0 shares

Someone wants to overload the == operator for value comparison instead of reference comparison. Java, being Java, has a complete meltdown because that would be "abuse." Meanwhile, C++ just shrugs and says "go ahead" when asked about overloading the & operator to nuke an object's internal data. Java protects you from yourself by refusing operator overloading entirely. C++ hands you a loaded footgun and a blindfold, then walks away whistling. One language thinks you're a child who can't be trusted with scissors. The other assumes you're a responsible adult who definitely won't use operator overloading to create cursed abominations that make code reviewers weep. Spoiler: C++ is wrong about you being responsible.

Clod Is Opensource This Is The Future

AI Security Git Programming

24 days ago 315.6K views 0 shares

Someone trained an AI model on a random person's social media posts and released it as "clod-7b-instruct" - a budget knockoff of Claude. The README is basically a confession: "it's vulgar, incomprehensible, possibly immoral and illegal" but also "it's my daughter and i love her." Then admits they have no clue how it works, vibed the whole thing into existence, and may have accidentally committed their password to the repo. The raw honesty is refreshing in a world of polished AI releases. No benchmarks, no safety alignment, just pure chaos trained on someone named Iris's internet presence. It's like watching someone duct-tape a jetpack to a shopping cart and calling it transportation infrastructure. 10/10 would not deploy to production but would absolutely clone the repo to see what horrors await.

O'Reilly: Coding With GPT

AI Programming Debugging

25 days ago 169.7K views 0 shares

You know those iconic O'Reilly tech books with random animals on the cover? Well, someone finally nailed what coding with ChatGPT actually feels like. That chimera creature—half dog, half emu—perfectly captures the Frankenstein's monster you get when you blindly copy-paste AI-generated code into your project. Sure, the front half looks legit and professional, but scroll down and you'll find some ostrich legs that have no business being there. "Introducing the uncanny valley into your codebase" is chef's kiss accurate. It compiles, it runs, but deep down you know something is fundamentally wrong . And good luck explaining it during code review.

Was Not Able To Find Programming_Horror

AI Devops Bash Programming Debugging

1 month ago 417.9K views 0 shares

Someone built a plugin that traps Claude AI in an infinite loop by preventing it from exiting, forcing it to repeatedly work on the same task until it "gets it right." Named after Ralph Wiggum from The Simpsons. You know, the kid who eats paste. The plugin intercepts Claude's exit attempts with a stop hook, creating what they call a "self-referential feedback loop." Each iteration, Claude sees its own previous work and tries again. It's basically waterboarding for AI, but with code reviews instead of water. The best part? They're calling it a "development methodology" and proudly documenting it on GitHub. Nothing says "modern software engineering" quite like naming your workflow after a cartoon character who once said "I'm a unitard" while wearing a leotard. The real horror isn't just the concept—it's that someone spent 179 lines implementing this and thought "yeah, this needs proper documentation."

Inline SQL

Databases Webdev Programming Frontend Backend

1 month ago 353.4K views 0 shares

Drake rejecting raw SQL strings because of ORM trust issues? Nah, too mainstream. But writing SQL queries as inline CSS classes using TailwindSQL? Now that's the galaxy brain move we didn't know we needed. TailwindSQL takes the utility-first philosophy to its logical extreme: why write SELECT * FROM users when you could write class="select-all from-users where-active" ? It's like someone looked at Tailwind CSS's 47-character class strings and thought "you know what databases need? This energy." The best part? You get all the SQL injection vulnerabilities of raw queries with the verbose readability of Tailwind classes. It's the worst of both worlds, perfectly balanced. Your DBA will love debugging select-* from-orders join-users on-id where-status-eq-pending limit-10 offset-20 in production at 3 AM.

Have Fun Learning Gpt

AI Git Programming Debugging

1 month ago 242.0K views 0 shares

Someone woke up and chose violence. The goal here is to feed ChatGPT such cursed, chaotic code that it just gives up and starts hallucinating error messages. Think legacy PHP spaghetti mixed with recursive bash scripts, sprinkled with some jQuery from 2009, all wrapped in a Dockerfile that uses FROM scratch unironically. It's like trying to teach a language model by showing it only the worst code ever written. "Here GPT, analyze this 5000-line function with no comments and 47 nested if statements. Have fun!" The AI equivalent of making someone watch every JavaScript framework tutorial from the last decade simultaneously. Bonus points if the repo includes a README that just says "it works on my machine" and a package.json with 300 dependencies, half of which are deprecated.

Whoever Tried This Is A God

Git Programming Debugging

1 month ago 205.3K views 0 shares

The ascending brain power hierarchy of code sharing methods, where we start at "normal human" with GitHub, level up to "big brain genius" with Google Drive, achieve COSMIC ENLIGHTENMENT by taking literal photographs of your screen like some sort of caveman with a smartphone, and finally transcend all mortal comprehension by... reading your entire codebase out loud and uploading it to Audible?! Someone really woke up and chose CHAOS. Imagine debugging by rewinding to chapter 7, verse 3 where you declared that cursed variable. "Alexa, skip to the part where I forgot the semicolon." The absolute AUDACITY of turning your spaghetti code into an actual audiobook that people can listen to during their morning commute. Nothing says "production-ready" quite like a 47-hour audiobook narrated in monotone. GitHub: ✅ Version control Google Drive: ❌ No version control Photo of code: ❌❌ Good luck copy-pasting that Audiobook: ❌❌❌ "Did he just say 'semicolon' or 'semi-colon'?"

Browse