When Your Code Review Is Actually A Career Opportunity

Content eevee eevee reduce() is a very helpful function because it accomplishes two important tasks at once: writing unreadable code and showing off how smart you are 8:40 AM 52321 Twitter for Android 50 Retweets 9 Quote Tweets 276 Likes

Content When you accidentally open Android Studio instead of Chrome: This little maneuver is gonna cost us 51 years

Java developers have this special talent for turning a simple problem into an architectural masterpiece nobody asked for. You need to create an order? Cool. But wait—what if we need an interface for flexibility? And obviously we need a factory to create those orders. But hold on, what if we need to create factories? Better make a factory factory . And naturally, that factory factory needs an interface too. Before you know it, you've got 47 files just to instantiate a single object. The best part? They'll defend this madness by saying it's "maintainable" and "testable" while the rest of us are shipping features. Enterprise Java turned abstraction into a competitive sport, and honestly, they're winning medals nobody wants. Meanwhile, Python devs are over here like: order = Order() and calling it a day.

Content , Kotlin, Scala Groovy Inspired by Java

Content JS factorial.js ... 1 JavaScript expert: 2 No, you cannot use a single identifier in your code. 3 You will get multiple errors about name conflicts. 4 5 const factorial function factorial (factorial, factorial, factorial) 6 7 8 factorialfactorial, factorial:factorialfactorial. factorial? factorial.factorial--factorialfactorialfactorial(factorial):-factorial; 9 10 return factorial factorialfactorial (factorial); 11 12 13 console. log(factorial(...,,7)); 14 15 JavaScript: hold my beer. PROBLEMS OUTPUT DEBUG CONSOLE usrlocalbinnode factorial.js 5040 ProarammerHumor.io TERMINAL

Someone finally found the missing link between Java and JavaScript—turns out it's literally carved in stone. Because nothing says "modern web development" quite like ancient tablets that have been sitting in the dirt for millennia. The joke here is beautifully simple: JavaScript has absolutely nothing to do with Java (they're as related as "car" and "carpet"), but people still confuse them. So why not lean into the absurdity? If you're gonna call it "JavaScript," might as well make it look like an actual ancient Java script—literally script written on a stone tablet, because that's about as relevant as the naming connection is. Fun fact: JavaScript was originally called "Mocha," then "LiveScript," and was only renamed "JavaScript" in 1995 as a marketing ploy to ride Java's popularity wave. It worked, but now we're stuck explaining to every new developer that no, learning Java won't help you with JavaScript. They're about as similar as this stone tablet is to your React app.