Screw You Broadcom

Ah yes, the classic developer job listing that thinks Docker, JVM, and "third-party APIs" are exciting tools. Nothing gets a developer's blood pumping like integrating with yet another poorly documented API that changes without notice every three weeks. The sarcastic "CAN'T WAIT" reaction perfectly captures the enthusiasm gap between HR's idea of "exciting tools" and what developers actually find exciting. Sure, I'll spend my days wrestling with Docker permission issues and JVM heap sizes while pretending this is my dream job.

Modern infrastructure is like those Russian nesting dolls, except each layer has amnesia about how it got there. First you run whoami to confirm your identity crisis, then whereami reveals you're trapped in containerception—a Docker container inside Kubernetes inside a VM inside a hypervisor inside someone else's datacenter. And when you desperately ask howdidigethere , the system responds with brutal honesty: absolutely zero recollection of the deployment decisions that led to this beautiful disaster. It's cloud computing's version of waking up in Vegas with no memory but a receipt for 17 EC2 instances.

Ah, the classic Docker bloat syndrome. Why create a svelte 50MB image with just what you need when you can ship a 2GB monstrosity that includes three Linux distros, a complete JDK, and somehow Visual Studio? The "minimal container" is just a theoretical concept developers tell themselves exists while they casually add another layer with "just one more dependency." By Friday, your microservice needs its own ZIP code.

Just turned what should've been a 10-line script into a microservice architecture with seven Docker containers and a message queue. The client wanted a contact form, but I gave them an enterprise solution complete with Kubernetes orchestration. Now I'm standing here in my sunglasses feeling like a tech god while some poor soul rows the boat behind me doing all the actual work.

The pinnacle of StackOverflow irony: your Docker localhost question is flagged as a duplicate of a post that's been closed for not being about programming, which has 5x more upvotes than the "correct" question. Meanwhile, both questions are closed for completely contradictory reasons. It's like trying to exit Vim - no matter what you do, you're trapped in an endless cycle of "closed," "duplicate," and "not about programming" while desperately trying to figure out why your container can't see localhost. The cherry on top? The 2.8 million views suggest thousands of developers have the exact same "not programming related" problem.

The classic "just sprinkle some buzzwords on it" approach to software development! Management thinks moving to the cloud is a magical fix-all solution, then gets annoyed when developers suggest actual architectural changes. And of course, shouting "KUBERNETES!" is the corporate equivalent of yelling "ENHANCE!" at a blurry security camera. Spoiler alert: neither one magically fixes anything without the actual work behind it. The irony is that the boss is simultaneously demanding cloud solutions while rejecting the very practices (containerization, cloud-native architecture) that would make cloud migration successful. Tale as old as time: technical debt wrapped in buzzword bingo, served with a side of hypocrisy.