Just Ignore And Try Again Later ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

THE AUDACITY! This code is checking if a user is NOT null, then returning the user... but if the user IS null, it returns null?! WHAT IS EVEN THE POINT?! 💀 It's like putting on a raincoat during a thunderstorm then immediately jumping into a swimming pool. The entire if-statement is so gloriously redundant it deserves its own monument in the Hall of Fame of Unnecessary Code. This is what happens when you're paid by the line instead of functionality. Chef's kiss of inefficiency! Just write return user and call it a day, PLEASE!

Content Back-end 500 Interna Server Error Front-end

Content WHAT'S NEW Multiple layouts to choose from! Improved results. Increased number of results up to 30! Fixed frequently occurring crashes, (Now they occur rarely) Introducing PicBoard!! First Image Search Keyboard for Android Search for trolls memes wishes auntes

Content Software Development Process 0. Something is wrong 1. Investigation stage 2. I can't fix this 3. Questions career choice 4. Questions life choices 5. Oh! A typo. Cool codegino

Ah, the classic "I'll just slap this laptop CPU onto a desktop motherboard" maneuver. Bold strategy, Cotton! What we're witnessing here is the digital equivalent of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, except the peg costs $300 and the hole has pins that bend if you look at them wrong. For the uninitiated: laptop CPUs are soldered directly to motherboards, while desktop CPUs (which this motherboard expects) are removable. Our intrepid builder has apparently pried a processor from a laptop and is attempting to perform hardware alchemy by placing it in a socket designed for an entirely different form factor. The confidence required to attempt this is truly inspiring. It's the same energy as trying to fuel a car with orange juice because "they're both liquids, right?"

So this is why my code breaks in production. Turns out bugs aren't just randomly appearing—they're being strategically trained to give wrong answers and crash systems. That cockroach teacher asking "what is 2+4?" and getting "5," "9," and "8" as answers isn't incompetence—it's a feature! By the third panel, they've mastered the art of being consistently wrong and are ready for their mission: total programmer destruction. No wonder my perfectly working code suddenly can't do basic math in production. These little monsters have been preparing for this their whole lives.