AI companies pitching their next model like "just give us another 500 megawatts and we'll totally achieve AGI this time, we promise." The exponential scaling of AI training infrastructure has gotten so ridiculous that tech giants are literally partnering with nuclear power plants to feed their GPU farms. Microsoft's Three Mile Island deal, anyone? The tweet format is chef's kiss—the baby doubling in size with exponential growth that makes zero biological sense perfectly mirrors how AI companies keep scaling compute and expecting intelligence to magically emerge. "Just 10x the parameters again, bro. Trust me, bro. AGI is right around the corner." Meanwhile, the energy consumption is growing faster than the actual capabilities. Fun fact: Training GPT-3 consumed about 1,287 MWh of electricity—enough to power an average American home for 120 years. And that was the small one compared to what they're cooking up now.

AI tools confidently rolling up with their "perfect" solution to your bug, and you—battle-scarred from years of production incidents—just staring them down like "not today, Satan." That icon is probably ChatGPT, Copilot, or some other AI assistant thinking it's about to save the day with its auto-generated fix. But you know better. You've seen what happens when you blindly trust the machine. Last time you accepted an AI suggestion without reading it, you accidentally deleted half the database and spent the weekend explaining to your manager why the company lost $50k in revenue. So yeah, the engineering team says "NOT YET" because we're still debugging the debugger.

So Microsoft casually drops the bomb that companies won't hire you without AI skills, and SHOCKINGLY—like a plot twist nobody saw coming—LinkedIn explodes with a 142x increase in people slapping "Copilot" and "ChatGPT" on their profiles. What an absolute COINCIDENCE that Microsoft owns LinkedIn! It's almost like the elephant is feeding its own baby elephant here. The visual says it all: Microsoft (the big elephant) is literally nursing LinkedIn (the baby elephant) while LinkedIn suckles on ChatGPT. It's the corporate circle of life, except instead of the savanna, it's a boardroom where everyone profits from your panic about being unemployable. The self-fulfilling prophecy is chef's kiss perfect: Create the demand, own the platform where people respond to the demand, profit from both ends. Capitalism at its finest, folks! 🎪

So AI code reviewers have reached that special level of insufferable where they're nitpicking globally-scoped cursors while your code actually works. The AI's sitting there like "No offense, but..." and then proceeds to take maximum offense at your perfectly functional implementation. You know what's wild? The code runs. Tests pass. Users are happy. But ChatGPT over here is having a full meltdown because you didn't follow some arbitrary best practice it scraped from a 2019 Medium article. It's like having a junior dev who just finished reading Clean Code and now thinks they're Robert C. Martin. The real kicker is that AI will roast your working code but happily generate complete garbage that looks pretty. It'll suggest refactoring your battle-tested function into seventeen microservices with dependency injection while casually introducing three race conditions. But hey, at least the cursor isn't global anymore.