Always Test In Production

Content El AceLewis my first calculator py Watch Star 612 Fork 80 Code Issues 25 M Pull requests 2 I Projects 0 Bd Wiki D Security li. Insights myfirstcalculator.py D 13 commits is 1 branch 0 releases 11 4 contributors Branch: mas PLAY New pull request Create new file Upload files Find file Clone or download y AceLewis Merge branch 'master' of https:github.comAceLewismyfirstcalcula.. Latest commit a7aabea on Mav 16. 2016 B gitattributes Added gitattributes gitignore files 4 years ago B gitignore Added gitattributes gitignore files 4 years ago B README.md E generator.py myfirst calculator.py B my first calculator 0 to1000. 20823 lines (20818 sloc) 753 Recommended from future import division 4 years ago -ES You're using jump to definition to myfirstcalculator.py by Acelewis TODO: Make it work for all floating point numbers too if 32 1: Because Python 2 does not know maths input raw input Python 2 compatibility print ('Welcome to this calculator!") print('It can add, subtract, multiply and divide whole numbers from num1 - int (input ('Please choose your first number: )) sign input ('What do you want to do? , -, , or num2 int (input ('Please choose your second number: if numl 0 and sign print("00 0") if num 0 and sign print ("01 1") if num 0 and sign print ("02 2") if num so and sien print("03 3") and num and num2 and num print ("5042 2100") if num1 50 and sign He 20806 print ("5043 2150") 20807 if num as 50 and sign 20808 print ("5044 2200") 20809 if num1 as 50 and sign as 45: 20810 print ("5045 2250) 20811 if numl 50 and sign and mm 46: 20812 print ("5046 2300") 20813 if num 50 and sign a and numbe print ("5047 2350") 20815 20816 20817 20818 20819 20820 20821 20822 if num 50 and sign s and num2 48 print ("5048 2400") if num 50 and Sign sand num print ("5049 2450") if num 50 and sign and num2 print ("5050 2500") print ("Thanks for using this calculator, goodbye :)")

The hierarchy of unhinged individuals has been established. Serial killers? Scary. Psychopaths? Terrifying. But the true monsters among us? Those developers who somehow write 1000+ lines in Notepad—no syntax highlighting, no autocomplete, no Stack Overflow lifeline—and the damn thing compiles perfectly on the first try. It's like watching someone solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded while reciting pi to 100 digits. Not natural. Not human. I've been coding for 15 years and still can't write a simple for-loop without checking the syntax three times. These people aren't programmers—they're eldritch horrors masquerading in human skin.

Content When their unit tests were wrong and your code was correct the whole time, making you waste hours of your life.

The infinite loop of developer suffering: write code, encounter bugs, fix bugs, create new bugs, repeat until retirement. Then we scroll through memes that perfectly capture our daily digital trauma and think, "I'm in this photo and I don't like it." That nervous laughter is just our coping mechanism for the existential dread of knowing we'll be debugging the same issue tomorrow. But hey, at least misery has company... and excellent WiFi.

The emotional rollercoaster of debugging in its purest form! From the initial panic of "Something is wrong" to the existential crisis of "Questions life choices" – only to discover it was a misplaced semicolon all along. That moment when your brain jumps from "I should probably become a farmer" to "I am basically a coding god" in 0.5 seconds after fixing a typo. The whiplash between imposter syndrome and supreme confidence is the core essence of developer psychology. It's not a bug, it's a feature of our brains.

Content Abhishek Nalin 2nd Building Threado.com 2d Nobody will remember: - Your salary - Your fancy title - How 'busy' you were - How stressed you were - How many hours you worked People will remember: - Your commit that caused a production issue