Surprise Backup

Nothing says "we take security seriously" like posting your admin credentials on a sticky note that ends up on national TV. That sign literally says "For Microsoft Session We Use Operator Password: Sab001" and then goes on about personal credentials for other systems. Some poor IT admin is having a heart attack right now while frantically resetting passwords across the entire organization. The best security system in the world, defeated by a post-it note and a camera crew. Classic example of why your security policy should include "don't write passwords where millions can see them."

UFW (Uncomplicated Firewall) is supposed to be your security blanket, carefully configured to protect your system. Then Docker comes along, looks at your meticulously crafted ruleset, and just... ignores it completely. For the uninitiated: Docker bypasses UFW by directly manipulating iptables, essentially creating its own little sovereign nation within your infrastructure where your firewall rules don't apply. It's like putting a lock on your front door only to discover your roommate installed a secret tunnel in the basement. And there you are, smiling through the pain as your security burns to the ground. Just another Tuesday in DevOps.

Security experts: "Use complex passwords, rotate them regularly, never store them in plaintext." Meanwhile, some server admin with their passwords.txt file accessible via direct URL, using "admin" as both username and password: "I'm something of a security expert myself." The tabs open in the background (phpMyAdmin, Cloud Shell, etc.) really complete the masterpiece of digital negligence. Chef's kiss to whoever set up this security nightmare.

Ah, the duality of random number generation! The top panel shows the proper way—importing libraries like random , time , or os to generate proper pseudo-random numbers with good entropy. The bottom panel reveals the chaotic evil approach—hardcoding your "random" generator without external input, which is basically just saying return 4 because it was randomly chosen by fair dice roll. Guaranteed to be random! The twisted face in the second panel perfectly captures the deranged energy of a developer who thinks Math.floor(Math.random() * 6) + 1 is too much work and opts for const getRandomNumber = () => 4; instead. Cryptographers are screaming somewhere.

THE ABSOLUTE AUDACITY of Windows to block a program I specifically want to run! 💀 First, Windows has the NERVE to tell me "This is a program you blocked" when I have ZERO recollection of ever doing such a thing! Then when I plead my case like "But I know it's safe! I KNOW WHAT IT DOES!" Windows just shrugs with an "Okay" like some passive-aggressive teenager. So I have to resort to LITERALLY TRICKING THE OPERATING SYSTEM by adding it to the exclusion list! The digital equivalent of putting on a fake mustache and glasses! And Windows just falls for it with "Sounds good to me" only to IMMEDIATELY quarantine it anyway! The relationship between developers and Windows Defender is basically just one long, dramatic soap opera where we're all just trying to run our own code without being treated like criminals! 😭

Someone just casually posted their "private key" wrapped in those fancy BEGIN/END markers like it's a legitimate cryptographic credential, except it's literally a Lady Gaga tweet that's just keyboard-smashing gibberish with some exclamation points thrown in for dramatic effect. Because nothing says "secure encryption" quite like AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHRHRGRGRGRRRGURB, right? The beauty here is that private keys are supposed to be these sacred, ultra-secret strings that you NEVER EVER share with anyone or your entire digital life crumbles into dust. But sure, let's just tweet it out to thousands of followers with proper PEM formatting and call it a day. Security experts everywhere just felt a disturbance in the force. The random Lady Gaga tweet being used as the "key" is *chef's kiss* because it's the perfect blend of chaos and structure—just like production code at 2 AM.