Am I Cooked?

When a dropdown explicitly tells you not to select something, it's basically sending an engraved invitation to every developer's curiosity. That "Only for Admin Use" option might as well be labeled "Click Here to See What Happens." Nothing says "robust security model" quite like putting admin privileges in a user-facing dropdown and just hoping people follow instructions. It's the digital equivalent of putting a cookie jar on the counter with a sticky note saying "Please don't eat" and expecting that to work.

Oh look, another Microsoft "feature" to bypass! The classic ms-cxh:localonly command is like that secret handshake that lets you skip the bouncer at the club. After 20 years in tech, nothing brings me more joy than Microsoft thinking they've closed all the backdoors, only for us to find the service entrance. It's the digital equivalent of "I know a guy who knows a guy." The fancy bear in the tux knows what's up - why surrender your email, password, firstborn child, and DNA sample to install an OS you already paid for?

The ultimate tech billionaire self-own! Elon confidently declares the Social Security database isn't de-duplicated, suggesting massive fraud... only to get absolutely demolished when someone points out he clearly has no idea how government databases work. The cherry on top? The "readers added context" feature on his own platform confirming that yes, the government does indeed use SQL. Nothing quite like spending $44 billion on a platform just so everyone can watch you get publicly schooled on basic database concepts. This is what happens when you skip Database 101 but still think you're qualified to critique government systems. Maybe next time Google "what is MySQL" before tweeting?

Ah, the classic corporate security theater where management proudly announces "industry best practices" while completely ignoring actual NIST standards. Nothing says "we care about security" like forcing users to change perfectly good passwords every 90 days, ensuring they'll write them on sticky notes under their keyboards. The irony is delicious - the very policies companies implement to "strengthen security" (complex password requirements + frequent changes + no password managers) actually make systems less secure by encouraging bad user behavior. But hey, at least management can check the "security compliance" box during the next audit, right before the inevitable data breach.

Ah, the duality of random number generation! The top panel shows the proper way—importing libraries like random , time , or os to generate proper pseudo-random numbers with good entropy. The bottom panel reveals the chaotic evil approach—hardcoding your "random" generator without external input, which is basically just saying return 4 because it was randomly chosen by fair dice roll. Guaranteed to be random! The twisted face in the second panel perfectly captures the deranged energy of a developer who thinks Math.floor(Math.random() * 6) + 1 is too much work and opts for const getRandomNumber = () => 4; instead. Cryptographers are screaming somewhere.

When the dev who built your UI validation thought phone numbers were just decorative elements. Somewhere out there, a database is screaming as it stores "74626282613" with no country code, formatting, or validation whatsoever. The slider is a particularly nice touch - nothing says "professional application" like measuring phone digits on a scale from "not enough" to "way too many."