When Your AI Reviewer Takes "Child.kill()" A Bit Too Literally

Content Chad assembly programmer I wrote entire OS in 8KB made with mematic ProarammerHumor.io Virgin python-only Help me, my "Hello World" is taking 18MB of RAM

Content Appetiser Apps The Most popular Programming languages JavaScript - 67.8 HTMLCSS - 63.5 f in SQL - 54.4 Python - 41.7

Content B tDiscordBots Requestl All In One Bot Bot Request Free Hello all! There's a few things that I'd like to compile into one bot that I've been unable to find already existing. I would like to create one bot to cover 3 different servers. There is currently no progress on this project except a very clear idea of what is wanted. The preferred codding language is JavaScript or Python. I'd love to work with someone who's also willing to talk me through the whole process - not to overwhelm but to learn as I'm very interested in the process behind the build. Features: A role specific Starboard Custom Ticket System Custom Logging Social media integrations (twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Facebook) Possibly more later e Please feel free to message me with ideas or suggestions! Thank you

Content Hacking with Python, JS Hacking with Java, Ruby, C Hacking with SCRATCH Hacking with ToonTalk Hacking with Android App Creator Just saying "I'm in ProarammerHumor.io

The elegant waitstaff vs. the ragtag pirates perfectly captures the data access divide. APIs are like fancy servers bringing you data on a silver platter with proper documentation and rate limits. Meanwhile, web scrapers are the digital pirates who'll rip the data straight from the HTML's cold, dead hands when no API exists. After 15 years in the trenches, I've written both. The API is what you show the client. The scraper is what you build at 2 AM when the client's competitor suddenly becomes "very interesting" to them.

The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! 😂 What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...