Behold, the galaxy brain move of creating an array of boolean conditions just to check if ANY of them are false by using .has(false)! Because apparently writing if (!condition1 || !condition2 || ...) was just TOO readable and maintainable. Someone really woke up and chose violence against code clarity. This is the programming equivalent of using a flamethrower to light a candle – technically it works, but literally everyone watching is horrified. The double negative with return not conditions.has(false) is just *chef's kiss* – maximum confusion achieved! Future developers debugging this will need therapy.
Turns Out, If You Want To Check Multiple Conditions, You Can Sugar It Like This:
1 month ago
304,742 views
0 shares
code-smell-memes, overengineering-memes, boolean-logic-memes, bad-practices-memes, readability-memes | ProgrammerHumor.io
More Like This
Is In Hell = 'True'
11 months ago
336.7K views
0 shares
Uml
4 years ago
119.1K views
0 shares
Recursive nickels
4 years ago
182.7K views
0 shares
I've just spent an hour looking for this error, this is programming in one image
4 years ago
156.6K views
0 shares
SAMPHON RGB Monitor Light Bar, Eye-Care Dual Light Reading Screen Lamp, 9 Modes Gaming Backlight LED Computer Lamp, 3 Colors Dimmable Frontlight, 15.75'' USB Desk Lights for Home, Office
Affiliate
Desk Accessories
SAMPHON
Loading more content...
AI
AWS
Agile
Algorithms
Android
Apple
Bash
C++
Csharp