Code smell Memes

Technical Debt Collector

6 days ago 272.7K views 0 shares

The compiler's just trying to help, bless its heart. Meanwhile, developers have mastered the ancient art of ignoring warnings like they're spam emails from recruiters. Those yellow squiggly lines? That's just the IDE being dramatic. Ship it. Warnings are basically the compiler's way of saying "I'm not mad, just disappointed" while errors are full-on "we need to talk." But let's be real—if it compiles, it's production-ready. The next developer who inherits this codebase can deal with the consequences. That's what we call job security.

This Is So Bad That It's So Good

Security Programming php Databases Backend

10 days ago 239.4K views 0 shares

Someone just reinvented the equality operator with extra steps. The ifBothCorrect function literally just checks if two values are equal, but instead of using === or == , they wrote an entire function that assigns them to variables, compares them, and returns true or false. It's like using a forklift to pick up a pencil. But wait, there's more! The authentication logic fetches ALL usernames and ALL passwords from the database, then loops through them in nested foreach loops to validate credentials. That's O(n²) complexity for what should be a single database query. Your database is crying. Your security team is crying. I'm crying. The cherry on top? They're storing passwords in plain text (look at that getAllPasswords() call). This code is a security audit's final boss. It's so beautifully terrible that it almost feels like performance art.

True Or True

Javascript Programming Debugging

17 days ago 250.3K views 0 shares

When you need to make absolutely sure something is true, so you just... set it to true in both branches. The classic "I've covered all my bases" approach that covers absolutely nothing. Either the data exists and we're setting trueOrFalse to true, or it doesn't exist and we're setting trueOrFalse to true. Bulletproof logic right there. This is the programming equivalent of those "choose your own adventure" books where every path leads to the same ending. Just skip the if-else and assign it directly, my friend. Your code reviewer is going to have a field day with this one.

Forgive Me Father

Programming

19 days ago 166.4K views 0 shares

We've all been there—staring at a codebase that desperately needs refactoring, but the deadline is tomorrow and you just need it to work . So you copy-paste that function for the third time, slap an O(n³) algorithm where a hash map would do, and ship it with a guilty conscience. The confessional booth awaits, but deep down you know you'll do it again next sprint. At least you're not using nested ternary operators... yet.

Party Hard

Programming C++

1 month ago 183.1K views 0 shares

When someone asks what you're doing on a Saturday night and you're literally hardcoding a massive array of random numbers like some kind of digital masochist. Nothing screams "living your best life" quite like manually typing out 7,62,2,46,79,83,26,82 and continuing for what looks like an eternity. The timestamp showing 17:54 is just *chef's kiss* – because who needs happy hour when you can have array initialization hour? This is the programming equivalent of counting grains of sand on a beach, except somehow less fun and more carpal tunnel inducing. 241K views because apparently we all love watching someone's descent into madness in real-time.

Iterator, Jterator, Kterator...

Programming Algorithms

1 month ago 244.5K views 0 shares

You know you've hit peak laziness when you're nesting loops and your variable names become a countdown to despair: i , j , k ... and then suddenly you're reaching for l and questioning every life choice that brought you to this moment. But here's the real kicker—instead of just using those single letters like a normal person, someone decided to get fancy and call them "jterator" and "kterator" because apparently j wasn't descriptive enough. It's like putting a bow tie on a dumpster fire. If you're three loops deep, you're either working with matrices, doing some cursed algorithm nobody should touch, or you've architectured yourself into a corner. Either way, that code review is gonna be spicy.

Year

Webdev Javascript Programming Frontend

1 month ago 236.7K views 0 shares

So everyone's screaming about JavaScript being terrible, but then you look at how developers actually get the current year in production code. Instead of just using new Date().getFullYear() , some genius decided to hardcode "2025" wrapped in a beautiful mess of <footer><small> tags that don't even close properly. The closing </small> is chilling AFTER the text instead of wrapping it correctly. Maybe JavaScript isn't the problem. Maybe it's the developers who refuse to use it correctly. This footer will be hilariously outdated in about 365 days, and some poor soul will have to manually update it while the rest of the internet just... uses a date function like normal people. The real kicker? They're complaining about hardcoded YEARS while literally hardcoding a year. Chef's kiss. 💋👌

When She Asks How Long Is It

Debugging Programming Backend

1 month ago 310.7K views 0 shares

Someone's codebase just jumped from line 6061 to line 19515. That's not a typo, that's a 13,454-line function sitting there like an architectural war crime. When your coworker asks "how long is that function?" and you have to scroll for the next 20 minutes to find the closing bracket, you know someone's been writing code like they're paid by the line. Pretty sure there's a Geneva Convention against functions this long. The debugger autocomplete showing line numbers in the five-digit range is basically a cry for help.

The Best Way To Make An Infinite Loop

Csharp Programming Debugging

2 months ago 365.1K views 0 shares

Someone discovered that C#'s ConcurrentDictionary.AddOrUpdate() method is basically a cheat code for infinite loops. Instead of the boring while(true) , they're using a lambda that ignores the key, ignores the current value, and just... keeps updating the same dictionary entry forever. The lambda returns value , which triggers another update, which calls the lambda again, which returns value , which... you get it. The genius part? The IDE shows "No issues found" because technically this is perfectly valid code. It's like telling your compiler "I'm not stuck in an infinite loop, I'm just very enthusiastic about updating this dictionary!" The output window spamming "Hello, World!" is chef's kiss—proof that sometimes the most cursed solutions are also the most creative. Pro tip: Don't actually do this unless you want your code reviewer to question your life choices and your CPU to file a restraining order.

Client Side Validation

Javascript Webdev Security Programming Frontend

2 months ago 203.8K views 0 shares

So you're checking if an email is already taken by sending it to the server, getting back a list of all registered emails , and then doing a client-side .includes() check? That's like asking the bank to give you everyone's account numbers just to verify yours doesn't exist yet. Not only is this a massive security vulnerability (congrats, you just leaked your entire user database to anyone with DevTools open), but it's also hilariously inefficient. Why return an array of potentially millions of emails when the server could just return a boolean? The backend dev is probably crying somewhere. The cherry on top? After doing all this client-side "validation," you're still showing success messages without any actual server confirmation. Chef's kiss of terrible architecture. 🤌

Just Reuse The Class Bro

Backend Programming Java Databases Cloud

2 months ago 351.0K views 0 shares

Someone really looked at their codebase and said "let's make one class do literally everything." Entity, DTO, Domain Model, API Contract, AND Kafka Message? That's not code reuse, that's architectural Stockholm syndrome. Sure, you saved yourself from writing a few mappers, but now your database entity knows about your message broker, your API exposes internal IDs, and your domain logic is coupled to JSON serialization annotations. Good luck explaining to the new junior why changing a Kafka field breaks the database migration. The tears in that meme? Those are from the poor soul who has to refactor this nightmare six months later when requirements change. Separation of concerns died so you could avoid writing three extra classes.

The Truth Is Watching Me

Backend Devops Programming Databases Cloud

2 months ago 330.7K views 0 shares

You know that feeling when you're in the standup meeting confidently calling it a "microservice" while internally screaming because it's basically a distributed monolith wearing a fancy hat? That nervous side-eye says it all. Your so-called microservice has more endpoints than a porcupine has quills, shares a database schema with everything else (violating every principle of service independence), and has "modules" that are just glorified folders pretending to be separate concerns. It's like calling a studio apartment a "luxury multi-zone living space." The worst part? Everyone on the team knows, but nobody wants to be the one to say "hey, maybe we should refactor this before it becomes sentient and enslaves us all." Instead, you just keep adding more endpoints and praying the database doesn't become the single point of failure it was always destined to be.

Browse