It's Inevitable: The Great CS Degree Desert Expedition

Oh. My. CODE. This is the ULTIMATE developer torture chamber! 🔥 You're LITERALLY TRAPPED in a sterile white room until ALL your unit tests pass?! The sheer AUDACITY! And that bottom caption - "agile was only ever gonna work in a world of magical girls" - is sending me into orbit! 💀 Because let's be honest, your sprint planning meetings would be SO MUCH BETTER with transformation sequences and special powers instead of Dave from backend complaining about story points for the 47th time. The "S/M" in the title isn't just Scrum Master - it's the sadomasochistic relationship we ALL have with our test suites! Embrace the pain, darlings!

Content Nobody: Pointers:

Python developers casually strolling through life while Java and C++ programmers get absolutely demolished by syntax errors. Nothing says "I'm superior" like not needing semicolons to survive. Meanwhile, the other languages are drowning in brackets, pointers, and compiler errors that make you question your career choices. Python's just there like "indentation is all you need, bro." The programming equivalent of showing up to a gunfight with a spoon and somehow winning.

Content 3rd - Follow Software Engineer 3d 4 In 2021 a research paper was published showing most efficient programming languages. Paper is here, but sadly behind the paywall. Gotta love "free academic pursuit" where they take in public money and then hide the results. https:Inkd.ingFTCtMzU Anyway: It shows that if people care about energy footprint of their systems, they need to ditch things like ruby, python and perl. Typescript also is super inefficient too. (e) C (e) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (e) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (e) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (e) Go (i) Dart (v) F 6) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i) Hack 6) PHP (v) Erlang G) Lua (i) Jruby G) Ruby G) Python G) Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 (c) C (c) Rust (e) C (e) Ada (v) Java (c) Chapel (c) Go (c) Pascal (c) Ocaml (v) C (v) Lisp (c) Haskell (c) Swift (c) Fortran (v) F (i) JavaScript () Dart (v) Racket (i) Hack G) PHP (v) Erlang (i) Jruby () TypeScript (i) Ruby G) Perl (i) Python (i) Lua Time 1.00 1.04 1.56 1.85 1.89 2.14 2.83 3.02 3.09 3.14 3.40 3.55 4.20 4.20 6.30 6.52 6.67 11.27 26.99 27.64 36.71 43.44 46.20 59.34 65.79 71.90 82.91 (c) Pascal (e) Go (e) C (c) Fortran (c) C (c) Ada (c) Rust (v) Lisp (c) Haskell G PHP (c) Swift (i) Python (c) Ocaml (v) C (i) Hack (v) Racket (i) Ruby (c) Chapel (v) F (i) JavaScript (i) 'TypeScript (v) Java G Perl (i) Lua (v) Erlang (i) Dart (i) Jruby Mb 1.00 1.05 1.17 1.24 1.34 1.47 1.54 1.92 2.45 2.57 2.71, 2.803 2.82 2.85 3.34 3.52 3.97 4.00 4.25 4.59 4.69 6.01 6.62 6.72 7.20 8.64 19.84 gO 56 23 comments 6 reposts

Content EXCLUSIVE EDITION BARNES NOBLE HELL World Sams Teach Yourself Java SEVENTH EDITION 24 Ours You've been here for 4 days how are you still struggling with this SAMS

Content How much code does one developer write a day? The last question to answer is; how much code are these people writing? That question is by far the most difficult one to answer concretely. As such, we will need to settle on a number or range that feels reasonable. The dirty truth is that many developers are not actually writing code all day. Rather, they are copypasting code off of the Internet and then adjusting it to suit their needs. Do we count this reality into our calculation? As with the Syntactic Elements argument before, I would say the answer is "Yes." The programmer had to read, interpret, and adjust the copied code to work the way they needed.