The Trolley Problem: Git Rebase Edition

Ah, the inevitable collision of serious software development and internet naming conventions. Someone actually suggested naming Git LFS (Large File Storage) as "Filey McFileface" in an official GitHub issue, and it got 170 upvotes! This is peak developer culture—naming critical infrastructure after the infamous "Boaty McBoatface" incident where the internet was asked to name a research vessel. Engineers can't resist an opportunity to inject absurdity into otherwise serious technical discussions. The real miracle is that Git LFS wasn't actually named this. Somewhere, a product manager is still having nightmares about it.

Ah, the eternal GitHub pronunciation debate has finally been settled by presidential decree! The pixel art podium has spoken: "It's pronounced 'JitHub'." Just imagine all those developers who've been saying "GitHub" with a hard G for years, suddenly questioning their entire existence. Next thing you know, they'll tell us SQL is actually pronounced "squirrel" and Python is "pie-thon." The best part? This is clearly a matter of national security, hence the flags. Nothing says "this pronunciation is non-negotiable" like a pixelated presidential address. I don't make the rules, I just enforce them with my pull requests.

The eternal struggle of a developer's vacation: lying in bed trying to relax while your brain keeps reaching for that framed reminder of all the half-baked GitHub repos you've abandoned. That sweet, sweet dopamine hit of starting a new project is long gone, but the guilt of abandonment follows you to the beach. Your code children are crying out "Daddy, why haven't you committed to us in 8 months?" Meanwhile you're pretending to enjoy coconut drinks while secretly wondering if your brilliant "Uber for houseplants" idea could actually work if you just refactored the backend...

Watching someone print out code for review is like witnessing a crime against modern development practices. In 2023? SERIOUSLY? That's 30+ pages of perfectly good trees sacrificed to the debugging gods when we have perfectly good monitors, version control, and code review tools. The confused Tom face perfectly captures that moment of "Did I just time travel back to 1995?" Nothing says "I don't trust Git" like killing forests to manually track changes with a red pen. Bonus horror: imagine them printing JavaScript with all those nested callbacks and dependencies!

That magical moment when you've spent 45 minutes troubleshooting why your Git push is failing, only to realize you're still using your password instead of a personal access token. The butterfly represents that elusive token you created six months ago and promptly forgot about. GitHub's like "Nice try with that password from 2019, but we've moved on. Maybe you should too." The eternal dance of modern authentication vs. your stubborn muscle memory continues...

Who needs proper branching strategies when you can just dump everything into one glorious commit? The top shows a complex git branch workflow with multiple feature branches merging together - you know, what they teach in those fancy "best practices" courses. Meanwhile, the bottom shows what we actually do: one straight line of commits because who has time for that organized nonsense? Nothing says "I'll fix it in production" quite like bypassing code reviews and merging directly to main. Git blame? More like git shame.