When Vibe-Coding Turns Into Vibe-Debugging

Content ARE You NERVOUS To SEE Me ON YoUR FLiGHT? SEE OTHER SiDS WoRRY NOT THE SOFTLARE I WROTE FoR ThIS PLANE IS BUG FREE SI. SOFTWARE Engineer BOEING 747 - 400 777 767 - 400. Goooo ScIen' RILE g

Content My 3 step plan to 100 error free software: 1. Catch all errors 2. Ignore all errors 3. Enjoy your error free software You're welcome.

The dark side of coding, this is. Staring at error messages about line 80 in a 70-line file is the special kind of hell reserved for programmers. That moment when your IDE starts gaslighting you harder than your ex, and your only ally is a cup of coffee that's getting colder by the minute. The existential dread in Baby Yoda's eyes perfectly captures that 4AM "why did I choose this career" crisis we've all had while hunting phantom bugs. May the caffeine be with you... because logic clearly isn't.

Oh look, it's the compiler we all secretly want but are too afraid to admit! The "AI C Compiler" (aicc) is basically what happens when you combine a programmer's desperation with their unwillingness to learn proper memory management. Instead of fixing your semicolons and memory leaks like a responsible adult, just throw your garbage code at ChatGPT and pray! "Will your code compile? Will it be fast or slow? Will it have memory leaks?" Who knows! It's like playing Russian roulette with your codebase, except all chambers are loaded and the gun is pointed at your production server. The best part? You don't even need to understand what you're doing anymore! Just make vague gestures at your requirements and let AI figure it out. Programming degree? Waste of money. Stack Overflow? Ancient history. Just whisper sweet nothings to the machine and watch it spit out code that's probably better than yours anyway.

Content 252 indentation, paragraph, see paragraph index, 30, 74-76, 150-154, 211-212 index, 74, 212 curly brace in argument, 75 idx file entry written by, 208 in command argument, 153 space around, 169 special character in argument, 75 too many on page, 143 indexentry, 75, 212 on idx file, 208 indexspace, 75 indicator, error, 29, 134 inf (inf), 44 subscript of, 190 infinite loop, 252 infinitely stretchable length, 100, 102, 215 information, moving, 65-77, 207-209 infty (00), 43 ink, rectangular blob of, 106 inproceedings bibliography entry type, 161 input character, 32 file, 12 interrow space. in array or tabul 169, 207 in egnarray envir in shortstack, 1 interword space, 14, before or after hs in math mode, 51 produced by invisi too much with s! without line break, intertsep, 200 intraword dash, 14, 1 invalid character erro invisible character, 12, 32 command, 169 delimiter, 47 environment, 169 term made with Amt text, 82, 97 iota (), 41 isodd, 196 italic type shape, 16, 3 in math mode, 51, 1 used for emphasis, I Jitem, 24-25, 34, 181

THE AUDACITY! This code is checking if a user is NOT null, then returning the user... but if the user IS null, it returns null?! WHAT IS EVEN THE POINT?! 💀 It's like putting on a raincoat during a thunderstorm then immediately jumping into a swimming pool. The entire if-statement is so gloriously redundant it deserves its own monument in the Hall of Fame of Unnecessary Code. This is what happens when you're paid by the line instead of functionality. Chef's kiss of inefficiency! Just write return user and call it a day, PLEASE!