Production bugs Memes

Git Commit Git Push Oh Fuck

1 day ago 204.2K views 0 shares

You know what's hilarious? We all learned semantic versioning in like week one, nodded along seriously, then proceeded to ship version 2.7.123 because we kept breaking production at 3am and needed to hotfix our hotfixes. That "shame version" number climbing into triple digits? Yeah, that's basically a public counter of how many times you muttered "how did this pass code review" while frantically pushing fixes. The comment "0.1.698" is *chef's kiss* because someone out there really did increment the patch version 698 times. At that point you're not following semver, you're just keeping a tally of your regrets. The real kicker is when your PM asks "when are we going to v1.0?" and you realize you've been in beta for 3 years because committing to a major version feels like admitting you know what you're doing.

Always The Ones You Suspect The Most

Debugging Git Programming Testing

4 days ago 114.6K views 0 shares

The Scooby-Doo unmasking format strikes again, but instead of revealing the villain, we're exposing the real culprit behind production bugs: ourselves. You spend hours blaming the framework, the compiler, legacy code, that one intern from 2019, maybe even cosmic radiation flipping bits in RAM. But when you finally trace through the git blame and check the commit history, surprise! It was your own code from 3 AM last Tuesday when you thought you were being clever with that "quick fix." The real horror isn't finding bugs—it's discovering you're the villain in your own debugging story. At least when it's someone else's code, you can feel morally superior while fixing it. When it's yours? Just pure existential dread and a strong desire to delete your commit history.

The Moment You Say "All Bugs Fixed"

Security Webdev Programming Debugging Testing

5 days ago 164.1K views 0 shares

That beautiful three-minute window of pure, unearned confidence between deploying to production and reality absolutely destroying your soul. The team just crunched through every bug ticket, high-fived each other, maybe even cracked open a celebratory energy drink... and then some script kiddie with too much free time decides to test if your login form remembers what input sanitization is. Spoiler: it doesn't. The "Hopefully we didn't miss anything..." is chef's kiss levels of foreshadowing. That word "hopefully" is doing more heavy lifting than your entire CI/CD pipeline. And of course, what they missed wasn't some obscure edge case in the payment processing logic—nope, it's the most basic security vulnerability that's been in the OWASP Top 10 since the dawn of time. Classic.

When You Post Increment Too Early

Programming Csharp C++ Javascript Java

8 days ago 151.9K views 0 shares

Someone updated that drowning counter with count++ instead of ++count and now zero people have drowned wearing lifejackets. Technically correct is the best kind of correct, right? The sign maker probably tested it once, saw it worked, shipped it to production, and went home early. Meanwhile, the lifejacket stat is sitting there at zero like "not my problem." Fun fact: The difference between i++ and ++i has caused more bugs than anyone wants to admit. Post-increment returns the value THEN increments it, while pre-increment does it the other way around. It's the programming equivalent of putting your shoes on before your socks—technically you did both things, just in the wrong order.

What Do I Like As A Developer

Debugging Devops Programming Testing Backend

10 days ago 151.0K views 0 shares

You know you've made it in this industry when you realize the real joy isn't solving problems—it's creating them. Writing code? That's just work. But shipping bugs straight to production with confidence? That's art. That's living dangerously. That's the rush of knowing your phone might ring at 2 AM because the payment system is down, and secretly loving the chaos you've unleashed upon the world. Every senior dev has been there: you stop caring about clean code and start caring about job security. Nothing says "I'm irreplaceable" quite like being the only person who understands why the system works (or doesn't). It's the ultimate power move—become the chaos, embrace the chaos, be the chaos.

I Don't Think This Should Be In Prod

Frontend Webdev Devops Programming Debugging

11 days ago 147.2K views 0 shares

Nothing says "we ship fast" quite like a production payment page displaying "TODO UPDATE MAPPING" as your credit card details. Someone definitely merged that PR on a Friday afternoon and peaced out for the weekend. The best part? It's on Hulu's secure checkout page. You know, where people enter their actual payment information. That TODO comment has probably been sitting in the codebase since 2019, survived multiple code reviews, passed all the tests (because who writes tests for display text?), and made it all the way to production where it's now charging real customers real money. This is what happens when your CI/CD pipeline is too good at its job. Deploy early, deploy often, deploy your TODO comments directly to paying customers.

Well Well Well

Testing Devops Programming Debugging

13 days ago 259.3K views 0 shares

You know that smug feeling when you tell the team "we don't have time for tests, we'll write them later"? Yeah, later just arrived. Production's on fire, users are screaming, and you're staring at a bug that would've taken 30 seconds to catch with a basic unit test. But hey, you saved what, 10 minutes? Now you get to spend 3 hours debugging at 2 AM on a Friday while your manager CC's the entire engineering org on the incident report. The consequences-of-my-own-actions pipeline is now in full deployment mode. Fun fact: Studies show that fixing bugs in production costs 10-100x more than catching them during development. But sure, skip those tests. What could possibly go wrong?

Lol, Me As A Developer

Programming Agile Debugging

17 days ago 109.4K views 1 shares

Companies love saying they want "honest developers" during interviews, but the second you admit there's no animation for swimming in production because nobody had time to implement it, suddenly you're not a "team player." The brutal honesty of telling stakeholders that features literally don't exist yet? That's career suicide dressed up as transparency. You'll just stand there staring at the water, knowing full well you can't dive in because the sprint ended two weeks ago and swimming got pushed to the backlog. Honesty in development means admitting half the features are held together with duct tape and prayers, but HR didn't mention that in the job posting.

One Of The Most Favorite

Testing Programming Debugging

20 days ago 387.9K views 0 shares

Classic QA engineer joke that never gets old because it's painfully accurate. We test for zero beers, integer overflow, negative values, random gibberish input—basically everything except "where's the bathroom?" because that's what actual users do. They don't follow your happy path; they ask questions your system wasn't designed to answer and suddenly your entire architecture is on fire. The real tragedy? QA finds 47 edge cases, you fix them all, feel like a hero, then production explodes because someone tried to use the app while their phone was upside down during a leap year. You can't win. The users will always find that one scenario you never imagined, and it'll be the dumbest thing you've ever heard, yet completely valid.

Why Playtesting Is Important

Gamedev Networking Programming Debugging Testing

28 days ago 206.0K views 0 shares

Developer proudly ships their shiny new chat feature for the multiplayer game. First player to test it in production? Immediately weaponizes it by pasting the entire Bee Movie script into the chat, causing a catastrophic game freeze for everyone in the lobby. Classic case of not stress-testing input validation. The dev probably thought "nobody would paste that much text into a chat box, right?" Wrong. Players will always find the most creative ways to break your stuff. No character limit? That's an invitation. No rate limiting? Challenge accepted. No input sanitization? Say hello to the entire works of Shakespeare. The ":D" at the end really captures the chaotic energy of someone who just discovered they can DoS an entire game lobby with copypasta. Quality assurance? Never heard of her.

The Developer's Eternal Dilemma

AI Devops Programming Debugging Testing

1 month ago 158.0K views 1 shares

The eternal developer hamster wheel, featuring sad Pepe as our protagonist. Try AI coding, get buggy production crashes. Fall back to manual coding, trigger impatient manager. Repeat until retirement or mental breakdown, whichever comes first. The modern tech cycle isn't about finding solutions—it's about choosing which problem you prefer having today.

Pick The Right One

Debugging Programming Testing Frontend Backend

1 month ago 190.2K views 0 shares

Left side: a comfortable office chair for writing code. Right side: a toilet for the inevitable existential crisis when your code inexplicably breaks in production. The debugging throne isn't ergonomic, but it does provide the necessary time and isolation for contemplating your life choices. Most senior developers have their best debugging epiphanies there, usually right after muttering "What the actual f—" for the fifth time.

Browse