The Redundancy Department Of Redundancy

Content ProarammerHumor.io

The ULTIMATE toilet paper analogy for JavaScript's most DRAMATIC value types! 💀 Non-zero values? FULL ROLL. Plenty to work with! But then we descend into the TRAGIC TRILOGY: Zero? Just a sad little empty cardboard tube. Still EXISTS but utterly USELESS for its intended purpose! Null? Just a BARREN rod. Someone DELIBERATELY removed everything. The AUDACITY! Undefined? The ABSOLUTE BETRAYAL - not even a HINT of toilet paper ever being there! Just like when you try to access that property you SWORE you defined!

Content 000 verizor 9:10 AM 000 Verizon 9:10 AM o verizon 9:10 AM 1 1 What do vou know about material design? Oct 19, 2016, 10:22 PM Enough to know that Blue 600 is Damn boy let me GIT some of that hex codes are hot So is java wouldn't mind giving you a unit test Oh don't tease me like that hope you're agile, be this just became a standup meeting Onlv if I can call vou CSS cause I like vour stvle girl let me gather vour requirements Tune a Message. Send I hope we can merge without any conflicts Let's do a pull request so we can commit and make it official call me scrum master cause I' find all vour use cases Do you approach your sprints in waterfalls because vou're making me wet the time and cost don't matter as long as I can scope out that ass Oct 19. 2016 11:12 PM Are vou enterprise architecture because like vour structure and how vou operate Tune a Message Send Oct 20, 2016, 7:52 AM fyi I'm sharing this convo with my coworkers Oh I'm 100 doing the same Oct 20. 2016. 8:27 AM hope you're ready to deploy this package Oct 20, 2016, 9:37 AM Wanna come over later because I got a few things I want to demo from my local Oct 20. 2016. 11:28 AM as long as vou can debua my performance Oct 20, 2016, 12:11 PM hopefully mv user experience leaves vou satisfied Tupe a Message. Send

No amount of QA testing will ever match the sheer destructive power of end users in production. You spent months testing every edge case, fixed all known bugs, and deployed your "stable" release with confidence. Then day one hits and somehow users find seven new ways to crash your app that should be physically impossible. It's like they have a supernatural talent for finding that one scenario your test suite missed. "I must break you" isn't just a threat—it's the unspoken mission statement of every user who downloads your app.

Ah, the classic programmer character development arc! First panel: horrified at your week-old spaghetti code. Second panel: the redemption twist where you realize that being disgusted by your past code is actually a sign of growth. It's like your code is secretly training you through shame. "What kind of sleep-deprived monster wrote this garbage? Oh wait... it was me last Tuesday." The ability to recognize your past mistakes is the true power-up sequence. The real plot twist? Six months from now, you'll look at today's "improved" code with the same horror. It's the circle of dev life.

When your code is held together by a cascade of else if statements that somehow manage to keep the entire structure from collapsing. Sure, it's a nightmare to maintain, and any slight change might bring the whole thing crashing down, but hey—it passed QA! This is basically the architectural equivalent of saying "I'll fix it in production" while crossing your fingers behind your back. The building inspector would definitely give this code a 418: I'm a teapot, because this logic shouldn't be serving anything.